Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers add four more to the practice squad


Carolina Panthers
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is a good discussion. Interesting to see everyone's interpretation. I know we did upgrade at OL and offensive plyacalling. Defense I struggle with cause I think we got slightly better on DL but worse (overall) in lb play. Safety is better, but CB? Depends if horn can stay healthy. We'll miss Jackson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

There is just no world in which I am gonna agree that we aren't worse. Now, this is a sinking versus floating turds argument ultimately.

I will go with the floaters if I must choose. Sinking ass splatter (or depth charges if you will) statistically speaking causes more toilet clogs than the floaters due to more open real estate along the bottom dispense portal which frees up space for more exit speed and velocity during the actual flush or discarding of ass product for said turds.

Edited by Ricky Prickles
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are getting better by continuously churning the PS, then we will definitely in February. The fact I have to point out how ridiculous this sounds is how dumb the notion is.

Bettering your 67th, 68th and 69th players on a League worst team is like acquiring a beat up old piece of crap car that barely runs and hanging an air freshener from the mirror which scent is 'new car small' and trying to convince people you actually have a new car.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If we are getting better by continuously churning the PS, then we will definitely in February. The fact I have to point out how ridiculous this sounds is how dumb the notion is.

Bettering your 67th, 68th and 69th players on a League worst team is like acquiring a beat up old piece of crap car that barely runs and hanging an air freshener from the mirror which scent is 'new car small' and trying to convince people you actually have a new car.

Man those Little Trees are a game changer 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I will go with the floaters if I must choose. Sinking ass splatter (or depth charges if you will) statistically speaking causes more toilet clogs than the floaters due to more open real estate along the bottom dispense portal which frees up space for more exit speed and velocity during the actual flush or discarding of ass product for said turds.

Poo for effect.

Excellent analysis.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Panthero said:

This is a good discussion. Interesting to see everyone's interpretation. I know we did upgrade at OL and offensive plyacalling. Defense I struggle with cause I think we got slightly better on DL but worse (overall) in lb play. Safety is better, but CB? Depends if horn can stay healthy. We'll miss Jackson. 

We THINK we have upgraded at offensive playcalling. We HOPE that is the case.

One week from now we finally get a chance to see if that might be the case.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

We THINK we have upgraded at offensive playcalling. We HOPE that is the case.

One week from now we finally get a chance to see if that might be the case.

Fair. The guy has been a pretty good play caller and got some qbs that were on the scrap heap, some big paydays. But yes, still is speculation to this point. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Downgrade: DL, LB/EDGE, CB, KR/PR

No change/Push: QB, RB, TE, S, K/P

Upgrade(hopefully): OL, WR

I would say our overall depth is worse than last season, as well. 

Obviously subjective/speculative and we will what happens.

Bout to have to turn heel on kungfu. 😢 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthero said:

Bout to have to turn heel on kungfu. 😢 

Hey, I hope I'm wrong too. I wish I didn't believe this either.

As I have stated many times, I am at peace with how terrible we are now. I just want some evidence this season that we can change it and are changing it. It's an insanely low bar but that's basically where we are as a franchise.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I will go with the floaters if I must choose. Sinking ass splatter (or depth charges if you will) statistically speaking causes more toilet clogs than the floaters due to more open real estate along the bottom dispense portal which frees up space for more exit speed and velocity during the actual flush or discarding of ass product for said turds.

This has to be equally as weird as talking about Canales' voice.  

 

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Downgrade: DL, LB/EDGE, CB, KR/PR

No change/Push: QB, RB, TE, S, K/P

Upgrade(hopefully): OL, WR

I would say our overall depth is worse than last season, as well. 

Obviously subjective/speculative and we will what happens.

If you are talking week one, or say, week 11 or so. Deeper into the season to allow the new to break in... I think or at least hope to see a different picture than what we see with these new guys going into week one. 

Edit: There is new everywhere. I always overlooked week one. Well, until last year which was so far from good it was obviously hopeless. But now this is early with the conversion from preseason game 4 to Week 1. So I am looking to see what's going on week three. That's two games of film for DCs etc...

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, strato said:

If you are talking week one, or say, week 11 or so. Deeper into the season to allow the new to break in... I think or at least hope to see a different picture than what we see with these new guys going into week one. 

Edit: There is new everywhere. I always overlooked week one. Well, until last year which was so far from good it was obviously hopeless. But now this is early with the conversion from preseason game 4 to Week 1. So I am looking to see what's going on week three. That's two games of film for DCs etc...

Yeah, this is a preseason/offseason take. We will see what the actuality of the situation is after the season is completed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.  That too is truth.  Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL, but drafting a first-round OT now is either wasting the money we just paid for a free agent OR it is like paying top dollar for a new car and keeping it in your garage for a season.  A first rounder should give us 4-5 years of cap relief by playing from day 1. I shall elaborate here: Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...