Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Saints Game Day Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

If anyone wants to try to stomach a bootleg replay I can DM the link to you lol. I just wanna focus more on the routes and protection and see if that aspect was good enough for a decent qb

Look at every position. There's plenty of suck to go around so unearth the ugly truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus christ. First big sack in the 2nd quarter on 3rd and 11, Bryce audibles out of the play call, pulling Miles Sanders off the line and into shotgun with him. The guy covering sanders just stays where he is to the outside of Ickey, runs wide open to Bryce for an instant sack. lol. I wonder are they still letting Bryce lead protection meetings as well? I've never seen a qb audible into a play that leaves a pass rusher completely unblocked

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ProcessBlue2 said:

I think most of the media has had enough of it. Sheena, Person, and Newton all had an "off" tone during their tweets today.

We are talking Mac if he is still there. Total King of Bryce excuse makers. And nasty about it too, putting out the hate for doubters.

I had to turn him off, but might tune in to hear him whimper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Jesus christ. First big sack in the 2nd quarter on 3rd and 11, Bryce audibles out of the play call, pulling Miles Sanders off the line and into shotgun with him. The guy covering sanders just stays where he is to the outside of Ickey, runs wide open to Bryce for an instant sack. lol. I wonder are they still letting Bryce lead protection meetings as well? I've never seen a qb audible into a play that leaves a pass rusher completely unblocked

This play, Sanders was lined up in front of #1 and Bryce called him back into the shotgun leaving that guy wide open 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, strato said:

We are talking Mac if he is still there. Total King of Bryce excuse makers. And nasty about it too, putting out the hate for doubters.

I had to turn him off, but might tune in to hear him whimper. 

Yeah I don't listen to them anymore. I do listen to Donnelly, Dennis Cox, and those guys on 99.9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...