Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Funny Stuff from Tyrell Sutton on Twitter


Panthers128

Recommended Posts

Sutton is the man. He is also NOT a FB which everyone seems to think he is. He is much better suited to run screens / catch passes out of the backfield. Very quick, small, good hands.
he does well as a FB and if that gets him on the field more then so be it.

you make it sound like a derogatory comment. i see him like a smaller le'ron mcclain in baltimore. dude can do it all when asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 5'8" and 213 he is short but not that little. He is an inch shorter and 4lbs lighter than DeAngelo Williams. I think he is pretty light for a FB but okay for a third back and to work the slot with Goodson this year. Problem for him is with a 40 time around 4.66-4.75 he has fullback speed. Compare that to Goodson who is 6 feet tall, 212 lbs and runs a 4.55 40 time. I would think Goodson will get more time at slot and would likely have more success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he does well as a FB and if that gets him on the field more then so be it.

you make it sound like a derogatory comment. i see him like a smaller le'ron mcclain in baltimore. dude can do it all when asked.

It's just I feel like he has a lot more to offer than just blocking. I watched him play on saturdays all through college, and for about 3 years of his career he and brett basanez were literally a two man offense. Terrible o-line and no receivers or TE's. He is a playmaker. And me being a homer means that I need to talk him up whenever the opportunity occurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is NOT a regular FB. Yes, we ALL saw him do great last season when he was in there...but some have suggested he'll start at FB over the bigger and thicker Fiametta. Sutton will be a broken down heap of rubbish if he plays an entire season at FB. Let him be our #3 RB and if Goodson can't perform well in training camp and pre-season he need not be on this team. I don't like Fiametta but at least he has size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At 5'8" and 213 he is short but not that little. He is an inch shorter and 4lbs lighter than DeAngelo Williams. I think he is pretty light for a FB but okay for a third back and to work the slot with Goodson this year. Problem for him is with a 40 time around 4.66-4.75 he has fullback speed. Compare that to Goodson who is 6 feet tall, 212 lbs and runs a 4.55 40 time. I would think Goodson will get more time at slot and would likely have more success.

Well since he ran a slow 40 he can never be a solid RB (sarcasm). Its funny how that guy with a full 1/10th of a second slower outplays him. That 40 means next to nothing when you have seen what he can do against NFL competition. While I wouldn't say hes fast he is definitely fast enough to be effective as a 3rd string RB.

And Sutton played FB (where he did surprisingly well at, love this guys versatility) one game he is not a FB. He could spell Tony if he is winded or injured for a game or two but he is not a FB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's very versatile, seeing as he is a decent RB and can be called upon to play FB if needed. Good enough speed, good hands and such. He'll be at least a good player throughout his career. I see him returning in 2010. Not so sure for Goodson, though. No need for four RBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales’ recipe for success is simple — slow the game down with long drives that keep the other team’s offense off the field. Long drives are built from short gains but short gains require more 3rd-down conversions.  The Panthers are converting 37.5% of their third downs, which is average but not enough. As a result, they have attempted 21 fourth downs — the most in the NFL — and they’ve converted 71.4% of them, ranking 3rd among teams with at least 15 attempts. The Chiefs are second @ 80% and the Colts are first at 88% but the majority of their conversions are short yardage runs - not passes.  The Panthers have had three big wins this season — against Miami, the Cowboys, and the Packers — those conversions have played a major role in each of those wins. Miami The Panthers trailed by 17 in the 2nd quarter, facing a 4th-and-5 at the Miami 48. Young threw a 21-yard completion and they went on to score 7 on that drive. Then in the 4th, down by 4, they faced another 4th-and-5 at the Miami 33. Young delivered a 17-yard completion for the 1st down and they went on to score the winning TD. Cowboys The game is tied and the Panthers take over at their own 14 with 6 minutes left. Rico picks up 16 yards and Young converts two 3rd downs, gaining 37 yards, but misses on a third conversion. At the Cowboys’ 40, facing a 4th-and-4 at the 2-minute mark — knowing the Cowboys likely score if they get the ball back — Canales has them go for it. Young converts with a 7-yard pass putting them at the 33 in FG range. They then go on to kicj the game winning FG. Packers Young was 2-for-2 on 4th-down attempts. Then on the final drive starting from their own 19 with the score tied, Young converts two 3rd downs for 19 yards and Rico adds another 19 to move them into field-goal range for the win. In total, Bryce went 2-for-4 on 3rd downs and 5-for-5 on 4th downs on critical plays in those games. When the Panthers needed 1 yard against the Packers on their own 41 early in the game, Canales went to Young. - not Rico. When they needed 4 yards to keep the drive going at the 2 minute mark against the Cowboys he went to Young. Those throws weren’t empty-yardage completions; they were high-pressure, must-convert moments that directly contributed to all three wins. I keep reading how the Panthers  are winning in spite of Young, that Canales doesn’t trust him and schemes around him. But these drives show the opposite: when the game is on the line, Canales has consistently put the ball in Young’s hands and Young has consistently produced in those moments.  Some people do well in normal situations but crumble under pressure. Others can be uneven in normal times but produce when the presure is greatest. The question is who would you rather have in the playoffs. More importantly, who do you think Canales and the FO would want?  
    • I think is worse news for Tremayne. They need special teams help with him questionable.  If T-Mac is down, XL, Coker, Horn, and Renfrow. No way Chisena gets meaningful snaps as WR, only on special teams. 
×
×
  • Create New...