Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Tank is on?


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

No we haven’t, at least not intentionally. This time it feels intentional so maybe we are serious about finally building the right way. 

we are best at tanking when not trying to tank.  When we don't try to tank, we tank pretty well. 

the one time we actually 100% tried to tank.....we played better (fired Rhule and insta-traded CMC).  That was Tepper/front office 100% believing they would lose out.   They failed to realize just how much of it was Rhule when Wilks stepped in and played some 1960s football and that alone was a 180 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

we are best at tanking when not trying to tank.  When we don't try to tank, we tank pretty well. 

the one time we actually 100% tried to tank.....we played better (fired Rhule and insta-traded CMC).  That was Tepper/front office 100% believing they would lose out.   They failed to realize just how much of it was Rhule when Wilks stepped in and played some 1960s football and that alone was a 180 

The only time Tepper tried to deliberately lose was the only thing close to success since he's taken over.  He is George Costanza.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Debo Samuel but a giant pussy and talks funny. Gadget player. Army knife, but not Swiss, just a single little bitch ass dull blade.
    • Thank you for literally proving my point in so much detail.  Which of those QB's you listed did not go on to be serviceable? Yes, there are a ton of variables that make comparisons less valuable in a lot of way but the whole point is can a pro QB overcome a bad or horrible start.  I'm sorry if you think 3 games more in his first year and 3 less in his 2nd somehow makes the Brees comparison not relevant.  That is blantently disingenuous and makes having real discussions a pain the butt.  We're comparing "similar" bad situations and bad QB play early in a players career. Some of the stats, like games won are lower for Bryce but still comparable.  Other stats like interceptions are in Bryce's favor, ie 19 for Bryce over 2 years and 31 for Brees.   Maybe we are not answering the same question. George stated "Show me anyone who has been as bad as Bryce through 30 games and turned into a serviceable player much less a star." I could have just said, Maddox and Young and proven his statement wasn't factual.  It's the over the top pearl clutching and hyperbolic statements that make my eye twitch.      
    • Imagine XL making that catch Nico Collins made earlier 🤣
×
×
  • Create New...