Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Finally a power ranking we are top 5 in..


Champagnepapi704
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Ever seen a bear in the jungle?

 

Kill or get killed im taking the lion every time. They are smart and trained to kill. Bears just use their size to defend themselves. They run it they hear gunshots. A lion isn't running from a fight unless it's something massively bigger like an elephant and the bear is just not big enough for a lion to back down.

You realize lions don't live in the jungle, right? LOL

I'm telling you, the Romans actually did this crazy poo and the lions died. The bears almost always won despite the foe.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Bears beat a elephant?

 

That I don't believe.

They probably didn't do that. They were psychos but they generally tried to setup fairly even fights. If one animal was significantly bigger there would be multiple of the smaller. So you'd have say three panthers vs. a bear. Then boys were wild. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First find a team named after amphibians or reptiles. 

And dolphins, they are bad asses what they feed of fish schools. They work in pods, like a school. Multiple dolphins and it is orchestrated, coordinated.

I was fishing a school of seatrout in a kayak and here they come, right in on my school. I definitely had to leave they could have knocked me off that yak pretty quick. 6 or 8 of them.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, strato said:

First find a team named after amphibians or reptiles. 

And dolphins, they are viscous what they feed of fish schools. They work in pods, like a school. Multiple dolphins and it is orchestrated, coordinated.

I was fishing a school of seatrout in a kayak and here they come, right in on my school. I definitely had to leave they could have knocked me off that yak pretty quick. 6 or 8 of them.

Gotta watch out for these too. 

daaeb58fa0be7d692af78762089998e4.jpg

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for the lion to have a chance he/she would have to go for the jugular on a quick strike.  If it misses the bear would simply break it in half or take a bite out of its skull like a kid on a tootsie roll pop.  In the bear's case its only gonna take one lick to get to the center...

Probably the best thread in a while though.  Kudos to OP.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I mean, if you die immediately but the animal you bit dies later I'd still say you lost.

snake would still be alive and you even touch some frogs you soon feel the effects and within minutes you're in bad shape. 

mosquitos kill more humans(2nd in food chain) than every animal combined. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think that's pretty good.  Got no issue w/ Jaguar over Panther.  Think Jaguars got the strongest bite of all the cats and the Panther doesn't got the weight of the others. 

I think the Dolphin is the one I'd dig in on as being misplaced.   I'd put it over at least the bottom 2 birds

Panthers are just melanistic variants of a couple big cat species. So odd are, our Panther IS a Jaguar. So unless we're assuming our panther happens to be a black leopard, the panther being ranked lower than the jaguar is just patent racism.

And a dolphin would absolutely demolish any of the birds on that list. Unless we're assuming the fight has to be on the land for some reason:

maxresdefault.thumb.jpg.8dd2a31a6db0a3f2a69f94f7e485c776.jpg

 

I have many methodological qualms with this rating scale!

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...