Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young PFF - Week 16


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, PappyMay said:

that lil guy had me so nervous when he was running for the first down and went shoulder/head first instead of sliding and cutting it close. 

Me too, shouldn't be trucking people with his throwing shoulder but it shows he's got that competitive fire in him. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NAS said:

Bryce Young's in-game PFF grades:

73.9 Rushing

93.3 Passing

93.5 Overall Grade
 

the gameplan was very QB friendly.    That aspect has a lot to do w/ the odds of ending up w/ a good grade.   Heavy run w/ a safe/conservative pass plan. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

This should be fun to read later today

Wait until all the Bryce haters wake up haha

Bryce would have been a perfect score yesterday if not for a couple of throws.  One was not throwing it to Thielen in the middle of the field and the 3rd and 2 on the last drive of regulation.  He rushed that throw and needs to set his feet and complete it.  

He still has a long way to go to reach his potential, needs to get more consistent but yesterday was a great way to bounce back from 4 turnovers last week. 

3 TDs, 0 turnovers, 226 total yards.  Solid day.

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 5
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

the gameplan was very QB friendly.    That aspect has a lot to do w/ the odds of ending up w/ a good grade.   Heavy run w/ a safe/conservative pass plan. 

This is true, but he did his job within the framework that's all you can ask for.  The gameplan worked

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NAS said:

This is true, but he did his job within the framework that's all you can ask for.  The gameplan worked

true, but it's a tough reality to accept often that it's all we can ask for....from the #1 overall pick, we gave up the farm for, in year 2.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce Young was the highest graded player for the Panthers against the Cardinals per PFF with a grade of 93.0

4 big time throws (a pass w/ excellent ball location and timing, generally thrown further down the field and/or into a tighter window)

0 turnover-worthy throws

 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

true, but it's a tough reality to accept often that it's all we can ask for....from the #1 overall pick, we gave up the farm for, in year 2.     

Once you can forget what we gave up for him and just look at him for what he is you start to appreciate what he can be and that he gives the team a chance to win. 

Was he worth the trade? No.   

Can he still help the team win and be the franchise QB?  I think Yes.

He's shown he has the ability in moments to be more than just a "game manager".  He made some big time plays yesterday and over the last few week.  If he can do that consistently for 4 quarters, he becomes a true difference maker.  

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NAS said:

Bryce Young was the highest graded player for the Panthers against the Cardinals per PFF with a grade of 93.0

4 big time throws (a pass w/ excellent ball location and timing, generally thrown further down the field and/or into a tighter window)

0 turnover-worthy throws

 

Bryce Young Week 16 Pass Chart

I mean, that is the definition of a safe gameplan coupled w/ Hubbard.  It's all check downs or throws to the outside and away from coverage.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...