Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Early NFL offseason chatter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

I guess Johnson and Glenn have all the time in the world now to choose their next destination. History has shown even after a game like tonight, that usually doesn't affect interest.

Although if both leave, I think Lions fans are going to have a much bigger pill to swallow. Things tend to go bad for teams that has their staff poached away.

Glenn is almost assuredly gone but I think Johnson may stick around. The options this round aren't great, Chicago obviously being the best. But their search is strange and supposedly Johnson also wants to have a say in the GM.

I do think that if Johnson skips this cycle, he will not be a part of as many coaching searches next season. Eventually you say no enough and people will just skip you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Glenn is almost assuredly gone but I think Johnson may stick around. The options this round aren't great, Chicago obviously being the best. But their search is strange and supposedly Johnson also wants to have a say in the GM.

I do think that if Johnson skips this cycle, he will not be a part of as many coaching searches next season. Eventually you say no enough and people will just skip you.

He's not 60, he's 38 and widely regarded as one of the best offensive minds in the game right now, every team with an opening next year would still want him and put out a feeler to see if there is any interest on his end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Glenn is almost assuredly gone but I think Johnson may stick around. The options this round aren't great, Chicago obviously being the best. But their search is strange and supposedly Johnson also wants to have a say in the GM.

I do think that if Johnson skips this cycle, he will not be a part of as many coaching searches next season. Eventually you say no enough and people will just skip you.

Seeing lots of speculation that Glenn gets the Cowboys job...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

He's not 60, he's 38 and widely regarded as one of the best offensive minds in the game right now, every team with an opening next year would still want him and put out a feeler to see if there is any interest on his end.

But those guys are very flavor of the month, if you skip too many cycles it will eventually get you. Not saying it will happen but it definitely could.

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Seeing lots of speculation that Glenn gets the Cowboys job...

Yeah, that definitely sounds like speculation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

But those guys are very flavor of the month, if you skip too many cycles it will eventually get you. Not saying it will happen but it definitely could.

Yeah, that definitely sounds like speculation.

They're only flavors of the month if the offense they run then stops being elite, which I don't see that being the case next year with all the weapons they'll still have there.

The Lions would have to stay healthy on offense and completely tank for him to not be a hot name again next year, can't see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

But those guys are very flavor of the month, if you skip too many cycles it will eventually get you. Not saying it will happen but it definitely could.

Yeah, that definitely sounds like speculation.

Most of the serious talk has been referencing Glenn or Kellen Moore.

I don't buy the Deion bullsh-t.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Most of the serious talk has been referencing Glenn or Kellen Moore.

I don't buy the Deion bullsh-t.

I think most of these job searches are far less interesting than the sports media is implying. The likely candidate pools are fairly small for most of them. They just need to fill airwaves by drumming up horseshit like Johnson to the Raiders.

Sanders to Dallas is probably similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

That game didn't kill either candidate, but a one and done is not going to help Glenn or Johnson.  Goff going full Goof will be enough of a reason they lost, but the defense was terrible last night.

Kill? No.

But I do wonder if the emotion of yesterday (embodied by Campbell) will encourage Johnson, or possibly even Glenn, to commit to one more year in Detroit.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

That game didn't kill either candidate, but a one and done is not going to help Glenn or Johnson.  Goff going full Goof will be enough of a reason they lost, but the defense was terrible last night.

I mean, no defense in the NFL lost what they have. It's unbelievable they won as many games as they did.

If you ever wanted a better argument against Evero, it would be what Detroit did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd see him staying more than Glenn.

The Saints, Jets and Cowboys jobs have all been rumored as strong possibilities for Glenn.

Glenn has to take an HC job if offered to him, defensive coordinators can fall off a cliff in regards to HC interest if they have one horrible year.  He's getting a bit of a pass right now because of how banged up that defense is, but if they were to struggle again for a second season, especially if they were healthier, he'd likely lose all interest in him as a HC.

Johnson is the interesting one, as this type of loss, combined with the possibility of getting the HC job of whoever gets the #1 pick next year (and lucks into Arch) could very well be the type of thing to get him to come back to Detroit for one last try.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...