Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers take Tony Pike


Swarly

Recommended Posts

No question that he's the best available. Probably was with our last two picks as well. Can't hate the pick. Clausen or Pike will pan out, the other will get traded for better value than where they were drafted.

Bank on it.

yeah. We're definitely trying to get talent that can become great trade values imo. We're making relatively smart moves and I really don't mind this draft. LaFell, Edwards, & Gettis all have a ton of potential with LaFell capable of becoming a solid starter for us. And now this: Moore/Clausen/Pike three different QBs that will sure bring the best out in each other by simply being on the team. Please remain calm people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No question that he's the best available. Probably was with our last two picks as well. Can't hate the pick. Clausen or Pike will pan out, the other will get traded for better value than where they were drafted.

Bank on it.

Pike was pretty much an insurance pick. We finally have 3 legit QB's to choose from. One will be a back-up, the other a starter, and the last of the three will be traded for a pick in the years to come and we will get that pick back. Panthers are definitely addressing the QB and WR spots. Have to like that plus Eric Norwood is a beast!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually its a damn good value pick. Now we have a really really nice qb competetion at the least and at the most, matt moore will be traded for a skill player

Well with QB how many reps can you really spread around with what, 4 or 5 QB's that are ALL young? Moore, Pike, Clausen, Edwards (though he's supposed to be WR obviously) and possibly whats his name...cantwell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...