Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Iron Man 2

pstall

By pstall,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Razzy Newbie

Razzy

Posted
Posted

Looks to me like just another superhero movie, nothing special. Enjoyed the first one at first, but when I saw it the 2nd time around I liked it a whole lot less. Seeing it tonight though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dimbee Newbie

dimbee

Posted
Posted

I saw it yesterday and I enjoyed it. There were some great action scenes, good funny spots, strong dose of sarcasm with explosions. Works for me! I knew Thor was the next in the next series, but we've now had 2 references to Captain America in previous movies but instead we get Thor... They can churn out a quick (and likely disappointing) Thor movie a lot easier than they can a Cap flick, I guess. A Cap movie must be done the right way, bottom line. If Thor fails in an epic fashion, I wouldn't mind seeing him written out of the Avengers movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedMage138 Newbie

RedMage138

Posted
Posted

I saw it yesterday and I enjoyed it. There were some great action scenes, good funny spots, strong dose of sarcasm with explosions. Works for me! I knew Thor was the next in the next series, but we've now had 2 references to Captain America in previous movies but instead we get Thor... They can churn out a quick (and likely disappointing) Thor movie a lot easier than they can a Cap flick, I guess. A Cap movie must be done the right way, bottom line. If Thor fails in an epic fashion, I wouldn't mind seeing him written out of the Avengers movie.

Cap isn't even a founding member of the Avengers. They've already pretty much re-written the story to not include Ant-Man/Hank Pym/Goliath/whatever else you want to call him and The Wasp and replaced them with Black Widow, granted Hank Pym and Wasp are pretty lame, they cannot write Thor out.

It would be pretty cool if they wrote in the West Coast Avengers and let War Machine head that up with the likes of the Thing, Human Torch, US Agent, Moon Knight etc.

Also, I will be disappointed if Rick Jones and Hawkeye don't make an appearance somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rodeo Veteran

rodeo

Posted
Posted

Cap isn't even a founding member of the Avengers. They've already pretty much re-written the story to not include Ant-Man/Hank Pym/Goliath/whatever else you want to call him and The Wasp and replaced them with Black Widow, granted Hank Pym and Wasp are pretty lame, they cannot write Thor out.

come on. joined in the 4th issue, that's close enough for the movies' purposes.

the concept of the Avengers is, and has been, simply the best and brightest forming a team. i think anyone who has been a member is fair game for the movie. hell i think spider-man would be a good choice, and he didn't join until the 90's.

i think the movie Avengers will be Iron Man, Cap, Thor, Black Widow, Hulk (ed norton), War Machine, and maybe Hank Pym and Wasp.

It would be pretty cool if they wrote in the West Coast Avengers and let War Machine head that up with the likes of the Thing, Human Torch, US Agent, Moon Knight etc.

can't do that, they have the same actor playing Human Torch and Captain America. utterly terrible decision in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      Canales is holding us back

      By toldozer · Posted

      I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • frankw
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By frankw · Posted

      You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • Bama Panther
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By Bama Panther · Posted

      It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...