Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Betty White has long lost dirty sex photos


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

BETTY White is kinky little devil if this latest report is to be believed!

According to insiders, there’s a small collection of photos which depict the the actress, 88, and her late husband, television host Allen Ludden, engaging in sexual activities.

There are said to be four photos in total. The pics in question, which are reportedly being shopped to various media organizations, were recently found in a box belonging to Betty.

The box was supposedly left behind at her old house along with other memorabilia.

Meanwhile, Betty has insisted she won’t go down the same route as sex tape star Kim Kardashian by becoming a reality TV star.

“I shouldn’t be negative but they [reality TV shows] are not my favorite things in the world,” she said. “I don’t like them.”

http://www.showbizspy.com/article/206526/betty-white-and-late-husband-have-sex-pictures-report.html

tumblr_l16nkzi3f71qbxykyo1_250.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does this remind me of the movie "Airheads"? Where they asked for naked pics of Bea Authur! :eek:

Let's See Alan Lunden has been dead for abour 20 years, and she's 89 now. That would put her at most 69! Still, I don't want to see the pics.

Betty White has a new show on TV Land.

Betty White, other favorites in funny, fresh "Hot in Cleveland"

We must have been having an awful lot of fun. Where did the time go? Jane Leeves, the lovably loopy Daphne from Frasier, is 49. Valerie Bertinelli, the adorable younger sister from One Day at a Time, is 50. Wendie Malick, the boozy fashion editor and former supermodel in Just Shoot Me, turns 60 in December. And Betty White - well, she's always been pretty old, but now she's 88.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...