Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I've been noticing this all along


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/07/19/poll-how-much-is-beauty-worth-at-work.html?GT1=43002

It's trully sad... I witnessed it first hand when dumbasses were hired left and right by companies like bank of america just because of their looks. I could never understood why morons got hired while smart people who gave it all in college end up jobless. fuging pricks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all true. i post awhile back, china hiring spokesmen. all you needed was a suit and be a goodlooking white male.

i got plenty of job offers during my soap opera looking days. you are funnier smarter(people will tell you)and got stuff given to you. i understand the reasons for dumb blondes wanting to stay thin and young. tis the start of me hating the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a "Just for Men" commercial where you see the same guy with Grey hair and beside him is himself with Brown hair. The 2 managers are talking and the woman says, "we need his experience," (pointing to the Grey haired man). The man says, "We need his energy. " Then the commercial combines the 2 images and the next thing the woman is all smiles and saying to the candidate, ""I have big plans for you!" (Latent sexual harassment?)

(This is the revised version)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think looks were so much more in the favor of women tho.

Guys can be good looking but they get the double standard tossed back at them.

It's all part of the fickle fabric known as humanity.

People get Jobs because of what they are not what they know. The smartest person should get the job but most of the time dose not. Smart come after White,Black,Woman and Good looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That should have been this year. Tough to sell to anyone worth getting when this crew is going into year 3 on the hot seat. I still think keeping Evero will sink them all after last year's showing. If/when he is scapegoated they need to show improvement or it's likely to be so eone else's problem next year. I do agree in principle tho, it all should have happened after last year's problems. 
    • I've listened to some things that have calmed the "Bryce was flat out terrible" to just "he was really bad" in Week 1. It's Year 3 though, and that shouldn't be the barometer. I've got 1% hope left for Bryce, and that's just blind homerism coming out.  I'm scared that as much emphasis as the team places on advanced stats and PFF that the team *doesn't* think Bryce was that bad in Week 1. Couple that with so many of the QBs in the league looking rough, offense being down in general, and I feel like there's a lot of "what if's" going on in the building instead of facing the music.  Lose Week 2, and we should switch the main focus back to building/churning the roster, evaluating young guys, and hoping our next QB can have a Jayden Daniels level of impact. As we're all well too aware of, QB is a crapshoot a lot of the time. Admit we made a bad pick, and go draft another. And another. Repeat until correct.     
    • I wouldn't want any of those starting as a rookie on day 1.  That said, we need a vet, that is not Andy Dalton, that can be the starter while a prospect grows and learns on the sidelines.
×
×
  • Create New...