Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pro Bowlers

LaChance87

By LaChance87,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

LaChance87 Newbie

LaChance87

Posted
Posted

I know alot of questions are looming about the the capability of this teams ability to perform on a level good enough to make a run at the playoffs, because of key losses and the unproven new additions (even though I think they have as goods as a shot this year as anyother year). We have, for the most part a pretty favorable idea of who the potential starts will be by week one. So my question is, of the starters, who do you think will be invited to the 2011 probowl by seasons end? With the assumption none are injured for entired season. We all know the more inclined players are: Beason, Williams and or Stewart, Smith, and feasibly: Gross, Kalil. In your opinion do you foresee anyother player that'll perhaps get an invite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frizzy350 Apprentice

Frizzy350

Posted
Posted

I think that there will be many deserving of the trip, but maybe 1 or 2 that actually make it.

this. we are a small market team. even with a better record or statistically superior numbers, fans will vote in dallas/pittsburgh/washington counterparts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doyle Collaborator

Doyle

Posted
Posted

Doesn't the fan vote only count for 1/3 of it though? Players and coaches make up the majority I thought.

I don't think its even a third of it for the fans if any. It could be manipulated too easily if they left any percentage of it in the fans hands. I think its 100% handled by the NFL in some aspect. They just let the fans vote to feel like they are a part of it. Do you think anyone other than panther fans are voting for Kalil? He made it even though I think it was a reserve situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SorthNarolina Newbie

SorthNarolina

Posted
Posted

I don't think fans should be allowed to vote at all. Players, Coaches, and sprinkle some writers in with it.

D-Will got snubbed in 2008 even though he had one of the better seasons a RB has ever had. No RB has ever put up his combo of yards, ypc, tds, and fumbles.

Once everybody knew his name he gets into the probowl in 09 even though his season wasn't all that impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smash_n_dash Newbie

smash_n_dash

Posted
Posted

Defense:

I don't think any of our DLs will have a chance at the probowl. I think we will rotate them in by committee like we do our RBs and together they may have great stats (very low ypc run defense, lots of sacks and blocked passes, etc.) but individually it will be average stats. Connor may have a great year but there isn't a chance he will be voted in when Beason and Willis are automatic locks. Godfrey has a chance at getting in but he doesn't have name recognition outside of the Carolinas so he's a slim chance.

Offense:

Matt Moore will probably put up around 3200 yards, 20 TDs and 13 INTs, in other words, a mediocre year. Thats not deserving of a pro bowl vote. Whichever RB gets over 1200 yards will be the one to get a pro bowl vote but isn't a lock since AP, Gore, Turner, and Jackson are all big name guys and they are the only RB on their team. Smith might get in only if he leads the league in something (yards, rec, or TDs). He'll be like Deangelo of 2008, deserving but won't get voted in until the year after. Gross will probably be the only OL to get in and only because of name recognition.

So in other words, the only two locks that I'm positive of are Beason and Gross with the likely chance that one of our RBs gets in.

But my final answer is that none of our players go to the pro bowl because they'll be in the super bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...