Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jerry's lockout strategy could backfire


Zod

Recommended Posts

Southern fans, imo, have always loved their sports teams and especially so in Charlotte. When the Hornets came here, they did fantastic through a boatload of bull shiznacky. The Bobcats do well, hell the Knights do alright.

It appears to me that Panthers fans may be fickle in general but come a start to the next season, the hype of pro football will bring it back. Southerners love their sports and with all due respect to you guys that love college football, it's just not enough and its just not the same product the NFL is putting out.

Did you have a precedent that makes you think that it will be a problem or is it just how quickly fans give up in the middle of the season? I dont know, I could see either happening I s'pose, but it just seems like it would take more than the lockout itself. The Panthers have always been a very respectable team with respect to what they are giving their fans and that started with the integrity of the owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent point Zod... it wouldn't drive away the fans of the likes of those that post on this board, but the majority of Panthers fans are just casual fans and it will drive away a lot of them.

yeah, but the point itself doesn't matter.

if a lockout causes the panthers to lose the "casual" fans, then by their very nature, they will return once the lockout is over to once again become casual fans. thus, no loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southern fans, imo, have always loved their sports teams and especially so in Charlotte. When the Hornets came here, they did fantastic through a boatload of bull shiznacky. The Bobcats do well, hell the Knights do alright.

It appears to me that Panthers fans may be fickle in general but come a start to the next season, the hype of pro football will bring it back. Southerners love their sports and with all due respect to you guys that love college football, it's just not enough and its just not the same product the NFL is putting out.

Did you have a precedent that makes you think that it will be a problem or is it just how quickly fans give up in the middle of the season? I dont know, I could see either happening I s'pose, but it just seems like it would take more than the lockout itself. The Panthers have always been a very respectable team with respect to what they are giving their fans and that started with the integrity of the owner.

Hopefully the Panthers don't start looking to build a new stadium any time soon. That could chase off many diehard fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great topic, Zod. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out if there is a lockout. I expect this topic to be the featured article in the sports page of the local paper now, and be the NFL topic on the local sports radio station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great topic, Zod. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out if there is a lockout. I expect this topic to be the featured article in the sports page of the local paper now, and be the NFL topic on the local sports radio station.

You forgot ESPN with Patty Y.

Yo, Patty, when you read this throw a shout-out to my boy Sticky Fingers from House in the article for me. Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know panthers fans are a fickle group. A few losses an you can't give your ticket away.

So what happens if the panthers have a losing season as a result if the veteran purging, and then there is a lockout the following season?

I don't think that is something that us recovered from quickly as far as fan support. Could set the panthers back to pre-superbowl days.

Will the casual fan come back right away?

Depends on the kind of advertising and promotions they do. Nothing more. Casual fans get suckered into things just as easily as they leave. The key is to draw them in, and it could be done relatively easily even after the lockout if executed correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty simple for a lot of people I've asked about this.

If the owner isn't willing to spend money on the team, why should the average fan?

Of course such a thought is blasphemous for the hardcore fan, but if the "discount team" label sticks it could hurt the organization's revenue streams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to look at it with what we know. No CBA, most players on a 1 year contract, all coaches on a 1 year contract. The answer will be Yes. And the team will be in trouble.

We can't assume that there will be a CBA next year, although we'd all like there to be, and we can't assume that they will extend any players or coaches during this season.

The Panthers didn't just not sign our FA's because we didn't have many. They cut players mostly of a certain age. Because this year alone there would be no hit against a cap. I understand Peppers' deal, I don't understand Delhomme's because of the money we still are paying him. They did him a huge favor.

Right now if the CBA passed I'm not sure we would be able to field 22 players that aren't kickers or named Steve Smith in 2011. Signing extensions if the CBA passes would be ugly because, hey, there would be a ton of cap room each agent would rightly be thinking. So if there is no CBA JR spends the least money of any team in 2011 but what will he have in 2012? There's not much and it could get very ugly very fast. It would be worse than pre-2002 days because then we wouldn't have an owner that we could count on to put together a winning team.

We'd be the Buffalo Bills, southern edition. Ralph Wilson purged in 94-95 and they have struggled since. No Bills fan, die hard or not, trusts Wilson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's also worth noting that Cam himself said that he felt safer when running vs. sitting in the pocket because he could see the contact coming and could better prepare for it. A QB running the ball doesn't have to be a sledgehammer. He just has to be effective.
    • That Falcons game is about as good as it gets. Especially on the road. I know the Falcons defense was bad but he was cooking with Coker, an undrafted rookie get the bulk of the receptions. If your QB has 5 TDs and 0 turnovers he is playing like a top QB, yardage be damned. The big question for me is how consistently can be play the whole season?  I don’t expect a game like that every week, but I also don’t want to see any performances like the pre benching or that Cowboys game (which was bad post benching). Bryce’s best shot at being the guy is becoming a mini-Burrow who is about as consistent as you can get at the QB position.  The good news is this QB class should be a fun one. So hopefully Bryce becomes the guy, if not it’s a nice class to let DC pick his QB and they should come into a great situation with a good OL, RB, young talented WRs etc…
    • Bryce Young is far less risky with his body when he runs than Richardson and doesn’t take many unnecessary big hits. Was much more worried about injury when he had that abysmal OL his rookie season than I ever would be when he runs/scrambles. 500/10 seems like a fairly reasonable prediction considering he had 250/6 in 12 starts last season. Of course literally anybody CAN get hurt, it’s just that we were assured by many huddlers that it was a sure thing with Bryce Young that he wouldn’t make it to this point in his career without significant injuries.
×
×
  • Create New...