Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox proved he can start a rookie WR, can he do the same at the QB position?


Mr ocho nueve

Recommended Posts

Just curious to see what everyone thinks on the situation. Fox proved that he can start a rookie WR in LaFell, but do you think if Matt Moore bombs out he can swallow his pride and give Clausen the start? I think he is looking for a reason to bench Moore, even though he has come out and said he is the man, we all know if another QB comes in and fox is impressed, Moore could see the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious to see what everyone thinks on the situation. Fox proved that he can start a rookie WR in LaFell, but do you think if Matt Moore bombs out he can swallow his pride and give Clausen the start? I think he is looking for a reason to bench Moore, even though he has come out and said he is the man, we all know if another QB comes in and fox is impressed, Moore could see the door.

OMG NO YOU DIDN'T!!!!

Panther55 is going to be all over this...best delete thread QUICK!!! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, LaFell ain't starting yet.

That said, the knock on Fox being afraid to start rookies is bogus. Fox's flaw is once he commits to starters going into seasons (whether it be vets or rookies) he appears to be unwilling to make a change if needed in season to his depth chart. Injury seems to be the only means to get Foxy to change his depth chart once a season begins in terms of starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...