Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Running Teams in the NFL


Mother Grabber

Recommended Posts

This morning, his schmarminess, John Clayton, said that running teams in the NFL are good for 8-9 wins at best. Our beloved Panthers are perhaps the best 'running team' in the league, and no doubt one of the more obvious about it. Many of us, myself included, have complained about the Fox plan being too conservative and too single minded.

Perhaps he agrees? Afterall, we did put a lot of stock into the future of our passing game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he is pegging New Orleans and Dallas to 8 or 9 wins then. Both were top 10 in rushing last year, LOL. Cincinatti was one of the best running teams last year. Anyone think with 85 and TO, they won't throw more this year.

Most any team has to be able to pass and run at the same time. We ran so often last year because we really couldn't throw it very well with Delhomme. I expect that we will throw the ball alot more this year and open things up if we get good quarterback play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he is pegging New Orleans and Dallas to 8 or 9 wins then. Both were top 10 in rushing last year, LOL. Cincinatti was one of the best running teams last year. Anyone think with 85 and TO, they won't throw more this year.

Most any team has to be able to pass and run at the same time. We ran so often last year because we really couldn't throw it very well with Delhomme. I expect that we will throw the ball alot more this year and open things up if we get good quarterback play.

Thats what it boils down too. Now Tennessee, thats different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina alone shows that thought process is garbage.

2008- 12 wins

2009 - with some of the worst QB imaginable for the majority of the season we got 8 wins. With average QB play (not great or even good) Carolina wins easly 10 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats what it boils down too. Now Tennessee, thats different

Wouldn't be surprised if Tennessee has to pick up their passing game also. I don't know that Johnson has another year like last year in him. Look what happened to Turner in 2009. He might be injury prone after all the abuse he took last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I agree with running teams automatically failing, but bringing up the Saints & Dallas doesn't help the argument. Both of those teams were top 10 in passing, which opened up their run game a lot more than us.

It's a quarterback league, and will continue that way with the constant rule changes and etc benefiting quarterbacks. Look at the Jets. Their passing game was awful and they basically won 7 games, and were given the last 2 games with Colts/Bengals resting. Then you have teams like the Titans who didn't establish their passing offense until later in the season, and would have finished with a better record had they established it earlier.

If we can just get our passing offense to average, we'll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I agree with running teams automatically failing, but bringing up the Saints & Dallas doesn't help the argument. Both of those teams were top 10 in passing, which opened up their run game a lot more than us.

It's a quarterback league, and will continue that way with the constant rule changes and etc benefiting quarterbacks. Look at the Jets. Their passing game was awful and they basically won 7 games, and were given the last 2 games with Colts/Bengals resting. Then you have teams like the Titans who didn't establish their passing offense until later in the season, and would have finished with a better record had they established it earlier.

someone on Sirius NFL commented about teams focused on stopping the pass and the swing back to the run once teams realized some teams might be exposed.

If we can just get our passing offense to average, we'll be fine.

I think it is worth noting....that the league is constantly changing. It is a passing league and teams are building themselves to stop it. At the same time it will be more difficult for teams to stop teams focued on the power run building for speed/coverage.

With Jake's play teams often put 9 in the box last year. We had 2 RBs at over 5 yards a pop. If not for turnovers that formula is very effective imo in today's NFL with the focus on most defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I agree with running teams automatically failing, but bringing up the Saints & Dallas doesn't help the argument. Both of those teams were top 10 in passing, which opened up their run game a lot more than us.

It's a quarterback league, and will continue that way with the constant rule changes and etc benefiting quarterbacks. Look at the Jets. Their passing game was awful and they basically won 7 games, and were given the last 2 games with Colts/Bengals resting. Then you have teams like the Titans who didn't establish their passing offense until later in the season, and would have finished with a better record had they established it earlier.

If we can just get our passing offense to average, we'll be fine.

Our running game depends on passing also. We need to be able to keep the safety out of the box and have the DE worried about the pass which makes them susceptible to the draw. And the run sets up the play action pass. We need a good passing game this year so we can score lots of points. We lost several games last year because of an anemic offense. With the defense still up in the year, we need to be able to win a few shootouts this year.

I agree we don't need to throw for 300 yards a game, but we will have to score 24-30 points to beat Atlanta or New Orleans this year.

And bringing up Dallas and New Orleans shows that the best teams can run and throw the ball. One side helps the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roflcopter. We got those 8 wins last year with the worst QB in the league and an unreal amount of turnovers. With a middle-of-the-road QB we would have won 10-12 games easily last year. This year with an easy schedule it's not at all unreasonable to think we can win 10. Clayton sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is worth noting....that the league is constantly changing. It is a passing league and teams are building themselves to stop it. At the same time it will be more difficult for teams to stop teams focued on the power run building for speed/coverage.

With Jake's play teams often put 9 in the box last year. We had 2 RBs at over 5 yards a pop. If not for turnovers that formula is very effective imo in today's NFL with the focus on most defenses.

That is a good point. With teams going to lighter faster DEs and DTs to get pressure, it allows a team like us with a very big offensive line to just blow folks off the line. Teams focusing solely on the pass play right into our hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...