Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Risers and Fallers per Gantt, 8-18-10


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I'm not forming my opinions just yet. Hardy is getting some serious hype behind him. His fame from 2 years ago is still there. He needs some serious time with the starters.

If he produces in the regular season, look out. ESPN hype machine garbage 24/7. If somehow Clausen is starting at the same time, you won't be able to watch without getting diarrhea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Leonard and Williams did not fall. We just wanted to hear from them and didn't--both are new. The next games will tell us whether Jarrett sticks or not. Same for Moore. I think one of the two will make the team.

The Jarrett comments last week about his maturity seem to me to have been nothing more that his agent advising him to try to drum up some positive energy before cuts. Again, the Jets game will tell us a lot about the new and improved Jarrett.

Is it possible that Moore and Jarrett are cut? I don't think so, but I think only 1 makes the team. I see us possibly going Smith, LaFell, Wright, Edwards, Jarrett, and Gettis. The only alternative to this might be placing Edwards, who is not ready to play, on IR along with Pike. I think they will if he looks bad vs, NY and TEnn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, I remember us thinking the same of Landon Johnson, who was Cincinnatti's leading tackler.

I was just about to say the same thing. Maybe the responsibilities our LBers are expected to handle are pretty tough compared to other teams. Maybe a linebacker for the panthers has to be smarter than the average bear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't Johnson a highly productive 3-4 ILB?

The thinking at least from a fan's perspective was that he was getting a ton of tackles because he was all over the field, and he would play better in a 4-3 because he was miscast.

Turned out he was just productive and he did very poorly in a 4-3.

Williams was a back-up that played well in a defense very similar to ours.

So the thinking here is that he's a diamond in the rough, a guy who didn't play because of the talented ahead of him.

Williams is way more likely to succeed than Johnson. Similar system and he's not a big FA signing which we don't do well at. He was a trade which we do well at.

Now the trade was a little iffy as we were just fishing for whatever we could get. They didn't want to totally screw Harris so it worked out for everybody. They were going to cut him either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't Johnson a highly productive 3-4 ILB?

The thinking at least from a fan's perspective was that he was getting a ton of tackles because he was all over the field, and he would play better in a 4-3 because he was miscast.

Turned out he was just productive and he did very poorly in a 4-3.

Williams was a back-up that played well in a defense very similar to ours.

So the thinking here is that he's a diamond in the rough, a guy who didn't play because of the talented ahead of him.

Williams is way more likely to succeed than Johnson. Similar system and he's not a big FA signing which we don't do well at. He was a trade which we do well at.

Now the trade was a little iffy as we were just fishing for whatever we could get. They didn't want to totally screw Harris so it worked out for everybody. They were going to cut him either way.

I'm pretty sure Cincy was a 4-3 defense when Johnson played there.

Back then, being the leading tackler on that team was like being the smart kid in the retarded class.

cartman-special-olympics-256x256.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When is Jamar Williams expected to return from his shoulder injury?

.My hope he was going to be our weak side solution when we lost Davis.Beason needs to be back in the middle

Doubtful. The only person that would replace Beason would be Davis and thats a long shot. The Will pos in the tampa 2 is the most important. Besides Connor is a better Mike then Williams is a Will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
×
×
  • Create New...