Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Okay, this is it. Choose your side. Jimmy or Matty.


SmootsDaddy89

Who are you behind?  

184 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are you behind?



Recommended Posts

Thank god there are only 58 morons who want to start a ROOKIE because we have O-Line issues.

Yes, Matt made some bad throws. No, he isn't Drew Brees or Peyton Manning. But my god, the man got a mild concussion because his O-Line didn't protect him.

Clausen would get mauled behind that line right now too... same as Matt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take Rodney Peete

Who gives a ------ who the QB is ...

O-line is not pass blocking

O-line is not run blocking

The coaching staff from Fox on down has no clue what to call

Fans are starting bandwagons for the QB they want

Does it really matter who the QB is ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can we just put the real QB in Armanti?? I mean he's the only qb we have that actually won anything....I mean the kid is a 2 time national champion...lol I say stick with moore for now jimmy will get better but until the oline improves our offense= not existent. and maybe just maybe we can get our corners to stop watching receivers catch the ball on em?? maybe? this is what happens when you get rid of your veterans Hurney, and Fox. when the Oline is blocking who was the great dump off receivers Moose and Hoover

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think Matt let the pressure of being "the guy" get to him. Last year he was just playing for the hell of it and having fun. Now that he is the high profile guy, hes snapping under pressure. Ill give it a few more weeks, barring the concussion, and if his decision making is still 2009 Jake Delhomme-esque, then time to put the future in and give him the team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After some of the calls last year probably won't see much of a drop off 
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48344034/nfl-begin-hiring-replacement-officials-given-state-negotiations-nfl-referees-association   Honestly fug these refs and their union. Resisting changes that would actually incentivize good performance and not seniority based systems. What a bunch of donkeys. Hope the replacements straight up take their jobs and never give them back. Sick of watching refs script games with no repercussions.
    • Donovan seems like highest risk to me. Lloyd and May have already established relationships with all these kids. There’s probably guys hitting the portal that they recruited from HS. And then there’s the possibility of transferring their own guys from their current teams. They’ve also been recruiting the HS kids for like the next 5 years already. Look at the Iowa coach who hit the ground running by transferring all his guys from his D2 program. Or going across sports to Cignetti transferring all his JMU guys year one then building off that to a national title year 2. Donovan is starting from square one having been in the NBA so long and he’s already 60. So you’re potentially punting year 1 for a guy you are just hoping to be a 10 year hire while you figure out how to actually develop your next home grown 20yr guy. That’s 1/10th of the time you have him, more or less at best. The hope would be that he would find some high level assistants who have been working the college recruiting trails already, but then are you giving up his ideal staff just to get a foothold in recruiting and transfers. Think Belichick year one was bad? Imagine how much worse it would be without Steve Belichicks transfer portal pulls. Hoping Mays or Lloyd are all they’re cracked up to be.
×
×
  • Create New...