Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading for a WR


Hairless Cat

Recommended Posts

Why dont we trade either a RB or QB for a vet proven WR? We're rich at both positions and have little else of value in excess of except draft picks. If we picked up a viable wr and got rid of a 3rd or 4th string RB and/or qb we could write our ticket to the NFC championship.

How are we rich at the QB position? We have our top 2 (no way you trade them)...next is Cantwell (a perennial practice squad player) and Pike (noodle arm, 6th rd draft pick, who can't even find the field this preseason).

Who would give a decent WR for either of those?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are we rich at the QB position? We have our top 2 (no way you trade them)...next is Cantwell (a perennial practice squad player) and Pike (noodle arm, 6th rd draft pick, who can't even find the field this preseason).

Who would give a decent WR for either of those?

Bingo MadHatter,like you stated,we have very little to offer in a trade for a compentent WR,plus there is very little (if any)out there that other teams would be willing to part ways with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my bet is a lot of teams would love either goodson or sutton. and if we keep those two we wouldnt need either dwill or j stew. lot of possibilities out there. we need to think about how best to get this team to the championship- I think one of our two starting RBs could be the answer. Whether management has the guts to do it is another matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, Hooker was a guy that was drafted in the 3rd round pick sitting behind a well established starter yet Detroit somehow saw enough to let him go after two offseasons.  Where does that fit into your ideal situation?
    • Like that matters. That's the first thing. I suggested that it's probably better to let a QB sit and learn, and that's what I meant. Secondly, in what planet am I making excuses, my friend, or engaging in any mental gymnastics in Bryce Young's defense? As I have said, I don't care if he turns into Mighty Mouse, it's time for him to go. In my opinion, he's too short to be a successful QB in the NFL. I have seen enough. I'd rather trade him and take my chances with Hooker, at least he's more of a prototypical size and can actually see where and why he's throwing the ball.
    • There is a scenario where our team comes out prepared to play football instead of shitting the bed for the first quarter. Every bad Bryce game seems to start with him looking incompetent - the OL looking incompetent - and the defense looking incompetent.  Boom, down 14 before we know what hit us. Imagine a world where we come prepared and play with a lead, and Bryce gets to fulfill his ceiling by managing a game instead of playing catch up. He's bad, but upon reflection he is not Clausen bad.  He can move the team down the field when he gets 4 - 5 seconds in a clean pocket against a soft zone.  I don't think Clausen could do that.
×
×
  • Create New...