Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Social Network


fitty76

Recommended Posts

Lol, it does look pretty lame.

Facebook is not ghey, myspace on the other hand....

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

Umm is there such thing as a movie that doesn't exaggerate? You know, aside from complete fabrications...and documentaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

He's worth a lot but he would have to do a lot to turn that into cash. Facebook wasn't even making a profit for a long time I don't know if they are right now.

His "share" in the company makes him a billionare but he's still not ready to cash out just yet like the google guys did.

Having billions of dollars at that age would rule and suck at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

I'm pretty sure most of the events were before they were billionaires.

Umm is there such thing as a movie that doesn't exaggerate? You know, aside from complete fabrications...and documentaries.

It's a movie about some guys who made a website. The exaggeration bothers me in this movie because the actual topic is quite lame. I never said there weren't a lot of other movies I feel are way too exaggerated. Hell, I hardly watch movies and dislike most TV shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
    • I saw Brooks maybe a few weeks ago, he was walking pretty normally. of course he wasnt running, jumping and cutting.
×
×
  • Create New...