Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Social Network

fitty76

By fitty76,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Wither Newbie

Wither

Posted
Posted

Lol, it does look pretty lame.

Facebook is not ghey, myspace on the other hand....

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DirtyMagic97 Newbie

DirtyMagic97

Posted
Posted

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

Umm is there such thing as a movie that doesn't exaggerate? You know, aside from complete fabrications...and documentaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SorthNarolina Newbie

SorthNarolina

Posted
Posted

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

He's worth a lot but he would have to do a lot to turn that into cash. Facebook wasn't even making a profit for a long time I don't know if they are right now.

His "share" in the company makes him a billionare but he's still not ready to cash out just yet like the google guys did.

Having billions of dollars at that age would rule and suck at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wither Newbie

Wither

Posted
Posted

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

I'm pretty sure most of the events were before they were billionaires.

Umm is there such thing as a movie that doesn't exaggerate? You know, aside from complete fabrications...and documentaries.

It's a movie about some guys who made a website. The exaggeration bothers me in this movie because the actual topic is quite lame. I never said there weren't a lot of other movies I feel are way too exaggerated. Hell, I hardly watch movies and dislike most TV shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • CRA
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By CRA · Posted

      yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...