Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Godfrey


CRA

Recommended Posts

should be benched. Going into his 3rd year.....still plays the exact same way he did his rookie year. Martin is solid. Just like he looked his rookie year. Pugh needs a shot.

No need to respond about his play after his injury last year b/c all he did was fool people with FFs. His coverge was horrible last year. His open field tackling was horrible last year......just like year one and just like today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree Godfrey does have trouble with coverage I would say he has improved since his rookie year. Not saying he is the long term answer at safety but to say he hasn't improved is kind of ridiculous, he did make good plays on the ball and did wrap up solidly on some tackles. The first touchdown was Marshall's fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree Godfrey does have trouble with coverage I would say he has improved since his rookie year. Not saying he is the long term answer at safety but to say he hasn't improved is kind of ridiculous, he did make good plays on the ball and did wrap up solidly on some tackles. The first touchdown was Marshall's fault.

Sorry but I disagree, Marshall was playing the Zone on that play and it was Godfrey's duty to cover his back.

Godfrey and his ineptitude caused that TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but I disagree, Marshall was playing the Zone on that play and it was Godfrey's duty to cover his back.

Godfrey and his ineptitude caused that TD.

Exactly. Marshall was covering the flat area. No doubt, Marshall sucked donkey balls today as well, but Godfrey basically gave up two TDs by not being where he was supposed to be over the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, I agree in saying that Godfrey is way overrated. Just a question but was Godfrey the SS or the FS today. I thought Martin, despite making less plays had a better day. Its usually a bad sign if a corner or safety is making a lot of tackles haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree Godfrey does have trouble with coverage I would say he has improved since his rookie year. Not saying he is the long term answer at safety but to say he hasn't improved is kind of ridiculous, he did make good plays on the ball and did wrap up solidly on some tackles. The first touchdown was Marshall's fault.

what has he improved on? He has been constiatntly horrible in his coverage asisgnments and when asked to make an open field tackle. He is a saftey isn't he????

People love turnovers. FF's, wide open picks b/c of throws off target, picks off other players breaking up passes, etc. is what he really has given us through his career. Over the past 2 seasons and 1 game there simply isn't a worse starting S in the NFL. And just like when Fox refused to replace him with Martin, Pugh will sit the bench unless a S gets hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree Godfrey does have trouble with coverage I would say he has improved since his rookie year. Not saying he is the long term answer at safety but to say he hasn't improved is kind of ridiculous, he did make good plays on the ball and did wrap up solidly on some tackles. The first touchdown was Marshall's fault.

This is false

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...