Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore


34cpantherman28

Recommended Posts

I don't see why everyone is freaking out over the game today, sure there were some bad parts. Moore's performance definitely could have been much better, but it's a starting point.

My view is that you can't really blame him for all the picks; receivers just weren't getting open for the most part and they were forced to abandon the run. It just seems a little harsh to blame all of those ints on him and judge him from the first game of the season.

Either way, it is a starting point and gives them something to build off of and I feel that they will. You can't judge a team by one game, especially not the first game of the season. We still have 15 more to go and it is far from over, hopefully Moore can prove himself over the next few weeks and our passing game and o-line improves and gels together

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm one of the biggest Moore fans out there and I really want him to succeed, but all of those picks were terrible choices on his part. Lobbing a ball into quadruple coverage isn't going to end well for anybody (unless you're the team with the quad coverage), I don't know what he was thinking. He should have thrown those balls away, but he didn't. Piss poor decisions like that cost us the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why everyone is freaking out over the game today, sure there were some bad parts. Moore's performance definitely could have been much better, but it's a starting point.

My view is that you can't really blame him for all the picks; receivers just weren't getting open for the most part and they were forced to abandon the run. It just seems a little harsh to blame all of those ints on him and judge him from the first game of the season.

Either way, it is a starting point and gives them something to build off of and I feel that they will. You can't judge a team by one game, especially not the first game of the season. We still have 15 more to go and it is far from over, hopefully Moore can prove himself over the next few weeks and our passing game and o-line improves and gels togeher

They were his fault, he lobbed 2 to covered receivers and threw 1 off his back foot to the middle of the field. Last year he was throwing the ball, now he's aiming the ball. Sure the OL played liked crap, but he had time on 2 of those throws and he should have thrown the other away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Moore made some HORRIBLE decisions today.... there is no way anybody can defend some of those throws, starting with that first pick. There were 4 defenders and 1 WR. That being said, the protection broke down in the 2nd half, there was no running game today and absolutely zero pressure from the defense.

Bottom line for me is Matt Moore will only be a good QB when the RB's run for 150+ yards a game, other than that I am still not sold on him until he proves me wrong otherwise. He still is no worse than Jake was last year :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only WR that makes sense in the first is KC Concepcion. He fills multiple roles in the offense and is a PR specialist.
    • That depends upon what happens with receiver this year and what happens with free agency next year. Hopefully we'll be good by addressing receiver this year (regardless of whether we snag one in the first round or not). If we don't and are unlucky enough for to Coker get hurt (and X solidifies his bust status, and JAGs be JAGing), then we may be fùçked! But I assume that Dan Morgan and company will feel compelled to look for answers in free agency and use that to set up the draft just like this offseason.  Reality is not as simple as we drafted this position X times in a row in the first. If you're suggesting that we could draft a position in the first four times in a row, that's not likely. At some point probability has to be taken into account. I mean, how many years in a row can you be unlucky with one position?  As I've said at times before, you try and plan for the long term personnel-wise and cap-wise of course, but things happen so, in a sense, you still must look at each season--each "team" if you will--unto itself each season. So many things can happen between now and then. A major industry can profoundly impact the bigger picture (like this year), someone could offer you a trade proposal that you can't resist, players might not have progressed to your expectations--you know, things like that. Moreover, you have to be aware of the dynamics of each draft class, including the fact that there could be unexpected draft risers and fallers during the college season. That's a lot. As of today, we expect the 2027 draft to have more exclamations than question marks at OT and the QB class and WR group is expected to be exceptionally strong. We'll have a clearer picture of whatever we'll have to focus on next year at this time.  Lastly, keep in mind that there's always more than one way to get you to where you want to go. The yearly puzzle is not static, it's dynamic and complex.   
    • I'm fine with Thieneman or McNeil-Warren.. Rodriguez won't last until 51 so they would have to trade up, he may end up being a late first round selection. Anthony Hill Jr. is more likely to be available. I don't expect defense in the first round now after the murmurings of finding another weapon for Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...