Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

with C. Martin injured, Edwards Activated?


1989

Recommended Posts

Personally hoping Jordan Senn can go.

Even if Martin is okay, it's still possible you could see Edwards active. He could go in place of LaFell or Jarrett. Better to have a mix than two of the same guy.

With LaFell being named the starter last week, you could rightly expect Jarrett to be the guy that gives up his spot for Edwards. But of course, the team could still decide to give Jarrett his 57th "second chance".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally hoping Jordan Senn can go.

Even if Martin is okay, it's still possible you could see Edwards active. He could go in place of LaFell or Jarrett. Better to have a mix than two of the same guy.

With LaFell being named the starter last week, you could rightly expect Jarrett to be the guy that gives up his spot for Edwards. But of course, the team could still decide to give Jarrett his 57th "second chance".

I don't think they'll throw Edwards in. They're still trying to see if LaFell or Jarrett is the No. 2, and we need to find that out quickly. I am one of the biggest anti-Jarrett guys on this board, but he showed more than LaFell did (which, after being in the league three years, is to be expected).

LaFell isn't going to get any better by sitting him. We've committed ourselves to youth at that position, and now we've got to take our lumps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sutton is good, then I'd like to see him get the nod over anyone. If Jarrett is also deactivated (not seeing this one, but if he is...), I'd rather see Gettis in than AE.. let the kid learn WR a little more first.

Plus, I'm dying to see how Gettis is in game situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally hoping Jordan Senn can go.

Even if Martin is okay, it's still possible you could see Edwards active. He could go in place of LaFell or Jarrett. Better to have a mix than two of the same guy.

With LaFell being named the starter last week, you could rightly expect Jarrett to be the guy that gives up his spot for Edwards. But of course, the team could still decide to give Jarrett his 57th "second chance".

But wait.. Didnt you read that long thread by CRA about Godfrey sucking in his 3rd year and needing to be replaced, even though he has done somethings on the field.. yet in the Preseason defended Jarrett more than his own Mother did with the aspirations of Fox saying "He has done good when he seen the field?" 3 years, 1td.. The experiment should be over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only player I would like to see pulled completely is Godfrey... he just flat out sucks. Jarrett at least has the redeeming quality of being able to catch the ball when he finally gets open. I was at the Saints game last year and got to see that amazing catch he made from the front row.. and omg, I was floored. Even more so that it was DJ making it :lol:

But yeah... Godfrey needs to be yanked quickly and put Pugh in his spot or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...