Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Make your case for the next Coach


panther4life

Recommended Posts

how many interviews has he had and still not gotten the job? The amount of chances he's gotten lead me to believe hes got potential, but baffled as to the reason no one has hired him yet.

And what about this Jim Harbaugh, I dont have time to watch college to, so I dont know much about him other than reading his wikepedia. That alone didnt sell me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how many interviews has he had and still not gotten the job? The amount of chances he's gotten lead me to believe hes got potential, but baffled as to the reason no one has hired him yet.

And what about this Jim Harbaugh, I dont have time to watch college to, so I dont know much about him other than reading his wikepedia. That alone didnt sell me

He's the token interview to get around the Rooney rule. Don't kill the messenger.

I would like Harbaugh or Gruden. I want an offensive minded coach. Gruden could groom Clausen and "fix" the offense. I also assume he'd be smart enough to leave Meeks in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Harbaugh 2) Fraizer 3) Brian schottenheimer

I could handle any of these 3 but let me make a point for Gruden.

Sure he won a Superbowl with Dungy's team but who do you think built the Raider team that he played against? Thats right Gruden did, well you could say he knew the offense of the Raiders and thats why they won but he still built them.

Brign him in as Coach only and I think we would win the Super Bowl in 3 years. He wants to redeem himself and would make sure we would win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harbaugh is number one on my list right now. Standford could be the first team in BSC history to start the season outside the top 10 and make it to the championship game. And by all reports, Harbaugh is a great coach and motivator. He would also be coming from a college system which could help with all of the youth we have on the team.

Next would be Brain Schottenhiemer. And I wonder is Marty would come along as a coordinator... He has that Jets offense really rolling now and IMO he is doing that with a QB that is more raw and less talented than Clausen.

Third opion would be Mike Zimmer. Yeah, he fields good defenses but just being a good coordinator doesn't mean you can be a good head coach and Zimmer is one of those guys I think has head coach qualities.

No Gruden, no Cowher, no Frazier and no Grimm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...