Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gmonet


mush

Recommended Posts

Gmonet is someone I've never met in person. Two months ago he agreed to sponsor half the money for the tailgate this Sunday vs. the Bears. We need that money to help pay for all the food so we can provide it on a donation basis to raise money for Toys for Tots. Ranucci is setup to do the tailgate.

So Friday (9days before the tailgate) Gmonet comes up and says he doesn't want to sponsor the tailgate anymore. Says that he is buds with Richardson and was turned off by some postings that were critical of Richardson and doesn't want anything to do with the Huddle anymore. So he's pulling out of his sponsorship pledge, which helps buy bikes at Christmas to needy children, because he was turned off by some poster from probably Illinois who has never come to a tailgate and is now leaving us high and dry on enough sponsorship money to make it where 100% of the donations can go to charity.

What do you call a guy like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you call them? Unreliable.

Even if his story is true, it shows a sizable lack of class to pull out on something like that. If you don't like the boards, don't pay attention to them. The community as a whole is not really represented by the day to day postings on this forum, imo - and I suspect that the group that partakes in the tailgating is nothing like the group that posts all through game day, but I could be wrong.

I love the Panthers, and I love the resource that the Huddle is, but I frequently find myself a bit annoyed with some of the posts here. If I made a commitment, though, no amount of posts would cause me to back out on it.

I'm sorry to hear the guy let you down. Not cool of him. =\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2697826&postcount=87

This thread has proven what I had suspected about the Huddle, and I feel sad I was right. The crude nature of this thread proves to me that most of the lame posters here have no f**kin' balls, are prolly in need of an acne treatment and show no class or sense of truth. Calling for a man's death, pain and suffering is beyond anything short of what this country has become...the amount of vile statments here would not be taken on the field to a player or a team executive...but you lame f**kers have the guts to spit this poo out on the site thinking people are as brain dead as yourselves.

Well, I take offense Zod, your site has shown rudeness is not an exception but a mind-set.

I challenged one person to show up at the field and bring any player who you can get, or any group of fans to BOA and walk up to JR and spout thi poo...but you saw the response or lack there of.

I would not sanction this poo anywhere and the fact you all let it drag on, but birch about a lame discussion about a logo is evidence of what crap shows up here.

You "death wishers" call yourselves Panther fans and call for the death or suffering of its owner are so f**king inane, I'll just say you likely belong to a sad group of trolls. Forword this thread to say Steve Smith, Beason or Brayton...see what THEY think of your poo!

Alverez...you can sponsor that tailgate on your own! Sorry but I am better than this.

tumblr_l4gjajmT4J1qbb70eo1_500.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...