Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

tony siragusa needs to shut the fug up


Grammer

Recommended Posts

besides his fat ass, did anybody else notice how all FOX commentators are all over the saints' nuts? when we play bad it's expected, but when they "play bad" the commentators will instantly start making excuses for it, never fails. The saints may have beaten us, but it shows all this season so far they still are a sorry ass team with no real talent that rely's on luck to win fug THEM AND "GOOSE"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't stand him.

My buddy hung out with him at a house party and said he was the coolest guy ever. He brought a bunch of seafood over and cooked it up and was hilarious. he confirmed the story about taking his first NFL check to his local bar back home and spending it all.

Still annoying as fug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

besides his fat ass, did anybody else notice how all FOX commentators are all over the saints' nuts? when we play bad it's expected, but when they "play bad" the commentators will instantly start making excuses for it, never fails. The saints may have beaten us, but it shows all this season so far they still are a sorry ass team with no real talent that rely's on luck to win fug THEM AND "GOOSE"

remember in 2008 when everybody was all over our nuts? A lot of people still picked us as the NFC's best even after the giants beat us. Comes with the territory of being a good team, especially if you won the superbowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Siragusa was an interesting sideline reporter when he first started working. He actually offered some insight into the game, particularly the line play.

The last year or two, however, it's just a guy who hangs out in one endzone and phones it all in. Adds nothing to the viewing experience and they should have left him on Bourbon Street this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...