Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Getting a new QB or DE shouldn't be our primary move this offseason.


VipMattMan

Recommended Posts

In the wake of Delhomme's performance and Peppers announcing that he doesn't want to play for us anymore, it seems that alot of people are looking to use whatever high-value moves we have to replace those "glamour" positions, whether it's the best solution on the whole or not.

Losing Peppers is big, no doubt, and we were already pretty thin at the DE position, but i think the biggest impact on that line would be to get a hulking DT to take up blockers along with Kemoeatu. Damione Lewis isn't a bad player, but he doesn't dominate the interior and is best coming up from a backup role in passing situations. A good interior makes your DE's better, and Charles Johnson and Brayton should be alright on the outside as long as blockers are being taken up.

I have seen a few posts about Albert Haynesworth get shot down due to the "team cancer" virtue, but if we aren't going to go for him we still shouldn't lose focus on the fact that the position may actually be our most critical spot to fill.

As for quarterback. I fully expect that we won't pursue a new QB this offseason, either through the draft or trade, and i'm personally ok with that simply because i feel like we have equal options on our roster. Delhomme is most likely going to be our starter next year unless McCown or Moore blow people away in training camp. He led us to 12-4, which is pretty hard to do in this league, and there aren't too many people that lose their jobs over that.

Perhaps they do, however, lose their jobs over 5 interceptions in a losing playoff game, but i expect Delhomme will be given another chance. Arizona's coaching staff gamed our coaches hardcore, both offensively and defensively. Delhomme's not the greatest QB in the world, but for all his propensity to throw into double coverage to Steve Smith it's impossible to have every single player, no matter if its Muhsin Muhammad or Dante Rosario, double covered like they were anytime he went their directions without the opposition having your offense figured out. That was Jeff Davidsons first outing as an OC in the postseason, and i think he got a hard lesson about the magnification on gameplanning that happens during the playoffs.

Still, being somewhat Delhomme apologistic for that game aside, we absolutely have to have other options beyond Delhomme available, which thankfully we do. I'm sure the coaches plan for that whole situation is for Delhomme to start next season. If we start to lose a hold on a playoff grab then McCown will come in as hopefully a veteran "spur" that we need. If we're out of it completely then the heir-apparent, Matt Moore, will come in.

Fine by me. Delhomme alone isn't going to cost us a playoff spot. There's no leniency for a "learning period". He's proven he can get us there, and if he doesn't then its on to greener pastures for us and we don't look back. Some people will say that Moore is unproven. So is anyone else you bring in, and Moore has shown enough potential for me to be comfortable in giving him a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a defensive end period.

From a depth perspective there's no question of that. We're short on DE's. But i don't think it's critical for us to run out and trade for a starter or use whatever high draft pick/s we get for Peppers for another DE. I'd much rather use a move like that on a big DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a depth perspective there's no question of that. We're short on DE's. But i don't think it's critical for us to run out and trade for a starter or use whatever high draft pick/s we get for Peppers for another DE. I'd much rather use a move like that on a big DT.

...we NEED a DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should use the first round pick we get from the pep deal on the best available Dl player at the position we pick at, use our second round pick on another DL player depending on what we get there go after a mid to upper level player in fa. Use those players to form a nice rotation with who we currently have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree that DT is every bit as important as DE. I think Charles Johnson can be a capable starter, and Tyler Braton actually exceeded my expectations. If Peppers would have put forth the effort Brayton did he would have had 20 sacks this year.

We need another DT besides Damoine Lewis. Lewis also puts forth a lot of effort and is even starter quality, but he is undersized and did in my opinion wear down a little as the season progressed.

Lewis was awesome when he was a situational pass rusher. I think he can give us a lot of good downs, and obviously excels in interior pass rushing. Have another massive DT opposite Kemo in running situations is key.

Ian Scott never made it out of training camp, and Darwin Walker never really did a whole lot. DT should be a Day 1 priority in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With how it seem more & more likely Pep will be gone next season, we seriously need a DE. I think we're fine with QB for now, but DE is what we got to focus if Pep don't stick around. Johnson & Taylor are more of a good serviceable backup, but I don't know if I trust them being fulltime starters though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the DT pickup as well as getting another DE.

Look at what Minnesota has with the Williams brothers. If we could find another 350 lb guy like we did with Jenkins and pair him up with Kemo we have a defensive line which instantly gets better when folks can't double team our DEs and still contain our DTs. We can better stop the run, protect against injury and allows us to begin using our safeties and linebackers in coverage or blitzing instead of having to commit them against the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...