Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you could only have one kind for the rest of your life


LifeisaGarden

What kind of meat would you choose?  

29 members have voted

  1. 1. What kind of meat would you choose?



Recommended Posts

I think realistically I would probably choose chicken because chicken is so versatile and it already makes up at least 80% of my diet. Plus with chicken you get eggs too.

But the glutton in me would probably choose pork. With pork you get bacon, sausage, NC bbq, pork chops, pork steaks, ham hocks, fat back, pork rinds, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think realistically I would probably choose chicken because chicken is so versatile and it already makes up at least 80% of my diet. Plus with chicken you get eggs too.

But the glutton in me would probably choose pork. With pork you get bacon, sausage, NC bbq, pork chops, pork steaks, ham hocks, fat back, pork rinds, etc...

Exactly what I was thinking, but I didn't feel like typing it all out lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pork, hands down... Pork chops, ribs, bacon-wrapped bacon, Italian sausage, ham sammiches, smoked butt, garlic, cheese & spinach stuffed Pork Loin, Cold tenderloin sammiches...Marinated, stuffed & grilled thick-cut chops, the be-all end-all...What other meat is so versatile?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think realistically I would probably choose chicken because chicken is so versatile and it already makes up at least 80% of my diet. Plus with chicken you get eggs too.

I'd pick chicken for the same reasons, even though I much prefer a good steak to chicken. Like you said, chicken is more versatile -- you can prepare it just about any way you want, and it would probably work in more dishes than the other meats on the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t know what to tell yall,  literally a NFL QB in slow motion breaks down where the ball should have gone and when…and the difference it provides Renfrow on that play.  It’s two different worlds for the WR.   Oh, and it’s probably then a completion of course     
    • The question was if you were Morgan what would you do with the team since Bryce is a bust.  I don't agree at all he is and I certainly don't blame the fans for his play. Fans being short sighted and dumb is totally separate from the question posed and in no way did I say or indicate that my fault of any coaching or on field play is the fault of said fans. My answer is I would Keep Pounding and methodically building.  If Bryce turns out to be a bust, then yes, horrible mistake.  The trade capital makes it even worse.  Just because we traded up for Bryce doesn't change anything now.  We begged for a methodical build and now we are doing it.  Right now.  And all it took was one bad game after all the progress last year for you to fold. If the Jags game is just another dip in the Bryce/Canales stock on the way up then the plan is still working. Canales, Morgan and company are one year in.  Building methodically.  Improving overall.  One bad game doesn't prove me right or you wrong.  And Bryce's play, which was bad, in that game isn't the last straw saying, yep, now there's is zero chance.  Let's cut him, maybe fire the coach, look for a new GM and start all over again.
×
×
  • Create New...