Topic 1 - Huddle Mod Candidates..

[Skew]

Follow up question: How would you, as a mod, handle this situation?

The actual story...

You made a bunch of statements regarding Matt Moore for which you have no backup while at the same time demanding backup from another poster (theRealDeal) whose statements sounded way more credible than yours. You claimed to know these things because you were a UCLA student, which may or may not be true, hence why I questioned it. Even if true, it doesn't really prove anything.

Your claim was that you could provide a link to a site that I had been plagiarizing, and that you'd post it with my next thread. I called your bluff, but also worried privately that you might post a link to a virus just to get back at people.

So now, you have the option of providing the link you claim to have, or you could actually man up and go back to the thread where you made the accusation, admit to it all being a lie and apologize for making false accusation.

Frankly, if you do neither, it won't matter to me, but it'll say a lot about your credibility. I'm not worried about mine. The thought that anyone might actually believe you isn't one I took seriously. People here know me well and know that I wouldn't do such a thing.

Your choice. Frankly, I've got better things to do.

I lived in 3 NFL football cities before I got here, and I still visit my old forums from those 3 cities, go to games in those cities, and I just see people posting stuff on this forum almost word for word that I read from another forum, thats all.

Well then, it shouldn't be that difficult to provide proof, should it?

Why do you think that message was for you? Feeling guilty? Like my papa use to say, a bit dog always hollers the loudest!

Riiiiight

Your bluff has been called. You've been shown to be a liar. That's pretty much all there is to it.

Deflect all you want, but after pulling that stunt, you now have no credibility whatsoever, so it's not really going to help. It's really only making you look worse.

Not really even worth the time anymore, really. At this point, I'm only bothering because I'm in a mischievous mood

[Catdaddy]

I guess we know who should not be a Mod along with myself!

[Mr. Scot]

Follow up question: How would you, as a mod, handle this situation?

I'd ban that Mr. Scot guy.

(never really liked him much anyway)

[Skew]

Correct Answer:

Go download porn. (this was an easy one)

[Mr. Scot]

Correct Answer:

Go download porn. (this was an easy one)

I always miss on the trick questions

[88 Bronco]

Follow up question: How would you, as a mod, handle this situation?

Grab a beer and watch

[Montsta]

1. What are the three top attributes of a good mod?

2. What would you do to improve the huddle?

3. Who would you ban first?

Three things I look for is a person that is a sarcastic dickhead, but is equal to all in his dickheadedness. Also, the mod must be over 30. Anyone under 30 in a position of power, even and especially interwebz police is all bad. Most importantly you must have been in a fairly large fight with your old lady at least once for coming onto the huddle from your phone, notebook or iPad at a highly inappropriate time. I've personally been in three for coming on here during wedding vows, a eulogy, and while driving in a zero visibility snow storm.

The only thing that should be changed is more research and development for an official iPhone and droid app, and for every ten pieces of pie or 100 points of rep you get, an autobot sends you PM'd booby pictures.

I'd ban Laetitia and bring back Nanner.

[Hawk]

head back to the lounge...poo like that never happens in there

[Catdaddy]

Of all the people on here you pick Mr. Scot to talk sh*t about? Really???

He might very well be the best poster on here... I know he is in the Panthers forum...

My toddler son just walked by and said make you the mod, and he wants some milk when you ready!

[Raskle]

Follow up question: How would you, as a mod, handle this situation?

1. Send a PM to both parties, explaining the rules of the board and asking them to calm down.

2. If 1 doesn't work (prolly not), explain that if they don't follow step one, they are in jeopardy of losing their posting rights for a few days.

3. If/when they still act like kids in the backseat on a long drive, give them a vacation to chill out, then promptly make fun of them in the infraction forum.

4. When they come back, ignore the hate PMs I'll get and laugh about it extensively.

5. Crack open a beer and talk about the good old days when JR wore thongs and Jester had a flower. Threaten the next person who mouths off with sending said pics until their inbox on here is filled up constantly with em.

[Skew]

No rules were broken so porn was the answer.

[KillerKat]

I hope whoever is elected bans the biggest troll here, Catdaddy.

[Sandy Claws]

I hope whoever is elected bans the biggest troll here, Catdaddy.

SO basically, Catdaddy gets banned because you won't use the ignore function?

[IRONMAN]

1. What are the three top attributes of a good mod?

1. being active

2. neutral on feelings towards members

3. understanding the rules and how to enforce them

2. What would you do to improve the huddle?

Nothing. Let the members create what the huddle is. A mod should be seen but not heard. If problems arise actions should be taken swiftly and quietly like a ninja. I want people to say: "What ever happened to that so and so fellow?" weeks after he has been taken care of with the only answer being "We don't know he just stopped showing up."

3. Who would you ban first?

I wouldn't ban anyone right now. Spammers, trolls, people with nothing to share and are only here to cause problems would be the first to go. Everyone has a right to speak their mind, make stupid threads that 90% of us dislike, and ask questions we all make fun of them for. Those however are not ban worthy offenses and everyone would be given fair chances.

This being said, I don't want to be a MOD, just replying to the thread.