Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who on this defense are you


NJPanthers12

Recommended Posts

comfortable with being starters?

Brayton-Johnson-Landri-Johnson

Anderson-Connor-Beason

Gamble-Martin-Godfrey

I look at this defense and although it has been impressive it definitly needs improvement. I think we need 2 new starting defensive tackles with Landri being a rotational player. I really like Charles Johnson if we can get a better starter on the other side of him. I love the linebacker core when Davis comes back and would not mind replacing marshall in the secondary. The way I see it next years defense should look like:

DE: New Guy

DT: New Guy

DT: New Guy

DE: Charles Johnson

SLB: James Anderson

MLB: Jon Beason

WLB: Thomas Davis

CB: Chris Gamble

SS: Charles Godfrey

FS: Sherrod Martin

CB: New Guy

I like Connor, Hardy, and Landri as rotational players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seconardy will be fine. need more run support inside. I think Ed Johnson will be good going forward with the rest of the guys rotating in, but he needs someone to start opposite him full time.

I feel Marshall and Munnerlyn get beat on every single short pass, i dont know could just be me tho. Ed Johnson is the one player on this team I cant get a read on, the 49er game he looked awful other games solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DE: Greg Hardy

DT: Richard Seymour

DT: Marvin Austin

DE: Charles Johnson

SLB: James Anderson

MLB: Jon Beason

WLB: Thomas Davis

CB: Chris Gamble

SS: Charles Godfrey

FS: Sherrod Martin

CB: Patrick Peterson

I guess you are assuming we are getting Austin in the third round?? I wouldn't be opposed to this at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Captain a starter?

Depends on if we draft Peterson or another corner early......I personally don't think Captain is starting material yet. I hope we get Peterson so then him and Captain will solidify a young secondary we can depend on for years to come

Link to comment
Share on other sites

E. Brown might be ready next year who knows. I'd keep him at least as a rotational player. Hardy would be my starter. Charles Johnson needs become the DE he was meant to be otherwise I'm ready to sign a DE in FA.

I'd love to pick up Seymour but since we are in a youth movement I don't know it if would happen. Landri is a good player and should stay. I feel Ed Johnson would be a solid rotational player as well.

I'd look into picking up Shaun Ellis or Cullen Jenkins.

We are stout at LB and the secondary is set except for Marshall's spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

comfortable with being starters?

Brayton-Johnson-Landri-Johnson

Anderson-Connor-Beason

Gamble-Martin-Godfrey

I look at this defense and although it has been impressive it definitly needs improvement. I think we need 2 new starting defensive tackles with Landri being a rotational player. I really like Charles Johnson if we can get a better starter on the other side of him. I love the linebacker core when Davis comes back and would not mind replacing marshall in the secondary. The way I see it next years defense should look like:

DE: New Guy

DT: New Guy

DT: New Guy

DE: Charles Johnson

SLB: James Anderson

MLB: Jon Beason

WLB: Thomas Davis

CB: Chris Gamble

SS: Charles Godfrey

FS: Sherrod Martin

CB: New Guy

I like Connor, Hardy, and Landri as rotational players.

Defense really isn't that bad of shape.

Hardy/Brown/Johnson can make plays IMO.

DT is really a black hole. A single pocket collapsing DT makes out DT's look SOOOOO much better.

LB is set, pending we keep Anderson and Davis is back to being a baller. Connor is a great guy just to have around.

Beason bottom line IS the best player on this team right now. Going forward keeping him, making sure he is happy, and putting players around him to make our D strong should be a top priority.

Secondary is fine, Godfrey is FINALLY starting to grow up, Gamble will be decent. Captain can be a solid nickle/ST guy. Marshall can walk Im afraid, don't be surprised if our first round pick is from LSU or Nebraska.

Instilling an agressive Swagger D is stupid important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
×
×
  • Create New...