Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who on this defense are you

NJPanthers12

By NJPanthers12,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

NJPanthers12 Proficient

NJPanthers12

Posted
Posted

comfortable with being starters?

Brayton-Johnson-Landri-Johnson

Anderson-Connor-Beason

Gamble-Martin-Godfrey

I look at this defense and although it has been impressive it definitly needs improvement. I think we need 2 new starting defensive tackles with Landri being a rotational player. I really like Charles Johnson if we can get a better starter on the other side of him. I love the linebacker core when Davis comes back and would not mind replacing marshall in the secondary. The way I see it next years defense should look like:

DE: New Guy

DT: New Guy

DT: New Guy

DE: Charles Johnson

SLB: James Anderson

MLB: Jon Beason

WLB: Thomas Davis

CB: Chris Gamble

SS: Charles Godfrey

FS: Sherrod Martin

CB: New Guy

I like Connor, Hardy, and Landri as rotational players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NJPanthers12 Proficient

NJPanthers12

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Seconardy will be fine. need more run support inside. I think Ed Johnson will be good going forward with the rest of the guys rotating in, but he needs someone to start opposite him full time.

I feel Marshall and Munnerlyn get beat on every single short pass, i dont know could just be me tho. Ed Johnson is the one player on this team I cant get a read on, the 49er game he looked awful other games solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

DE: Greg Hardy

DT: Richard Seymour

DT: Marvin Austin

DE: Charles Johnson

SLB: James Anderson

MLB: Jon Beason

WLB: Thomas Davis

CB: Chris Gamble

SS: Charles Godfrey

FS: Sherrod Martin

CB: Patrick Peterson

I guess you are assuming we are getting Austin in the third round?? I wouldn't be opposed to this at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

Is Captain a starter?

Depends on if we draft Peterson or another corner early......I personally don't think Captain is starting material yet. I hope we get Peterson so then him and Captain will solidify a young secondary we can depend on for years to come

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadassCat Newbie

OneBadassCat

Posted
Posted

E. Brown might be ready next year who knows. I'd keep him at least as a rotational player. Hardy would be my starter. Charles Johnson needs become the DE he was meant to be otherwise I'm ready to sign a DE in FA.

I'd love to pick up Seymour but since we are in a youth movement I don't know it if would happen. Landri is a good player and should stay. I feel Ed Johnson would be a solid rotational player as well.

I'd look into picking up Shaun Ellis or Cullen Jenkins.

We are stout at LB and the secondary is set except for Marshall's spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kurb Newbie

Kurb

Posted
Posted

comfortable with being starters?

Brayton-Johnson-Landri-Johnson

Anderson-Connor-Beason

Gamble-Martin-Godfrey

I look at this defense and although it has been impressive it definitly needs improvement. I think we need 2 new starting defensive tackles with Landri being a rotational player. I really like Charles Johnson if we can get a better starter on the other side of him. I love the linebacker core when Davis comes back and would not mind replacing marshall in the secondary. The way I see it next years defense should look like:

DE: New Guy

DT: New Guy

DT: New Guy

DE: Charles Johnson

SLB: James Anderson

MLB: Jon Beason

WLB: Thomas Davis

CB: Chris Gamble

SS: Charles Godfrey

FS: Sherrod Martin

CB: New Guy

I like Connor, Hardy, and Landri as rotational players.

Defense really isn't that bad of shape.

Hardy/Brown/Johnson can make plays IMO.

DT is really a black hole. A single pocket collapsing DT makes out DT's look SOOOOO much better.

LB is set, pending we keep Anderson and Davis is back to being a baller. Connor is a great guy just to have around.

Beason bottom line IS the best player on this team right now. Going forward keeping him, making sure he is happy, and putting players around him to make our D strong should be a top priority.

Secondary is fine, Godfrey is FINALLY starting to grow up, Gamble will be decent. Captain can be a solid nickle/ST guy. Marshall can walk Im afraid, don't be surprised if our first round pick is from LSU or Nebraska.

Instilling an agressive Swagger D is stupid important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Princely defends Icky while streaming

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      They use stats to create the basis of their grading system but the stats based on the outcome of the plays (that aggregate into what we football fans call "stats") are not incorporated into the grade. That's the best I can do in terms of explaining this to you. I've tried, every link from PFF has tried, yet you just keep on keeping on. LOL
    • TD alt
      Princely defends Icky while streaming

      By TD alt · Posted

      PFF uses the term "context normalized-scoring," which is based upon statistics. Hell, any serious metric or analytic systems are based upon stats and expectations, and looks at what players do against those expectations, but If you don't think that stats play any part in a players grades, be wrong. At the end of the day, it's heady anyway, so everyone is not going to understand everything. I'm done with this conversation for now. But just know, it's OK to be wrong.
    • LinvilleGorge
      Princely defends Icky while streaming

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      It's hilarious watching you crash out while being completely wrong. Every link you posted regarding player grades specifically told you that they aren't incorporating stats into these grades, that it's based on their evaluation individual plays. That sent you scouring the internet where you came back with soccer grades as some type of gotcha before you shifted to pass protection grades where you misunderstood that they were using stats to create the basis of their grading system but not in the actual actual creation of the player grades. Pointing that out sent you back to the internet to dig some more where you came back with their "Advanced Coverage Grade" metric which is separate from their player grade.    
×
×
  • Create New...