Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thoughts on Boobs...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I think its a safe bet that I have seen more boobs of everyday women (not strippers) in person than anyone else on this site.

Here is a new theory I am working on.

The size of the boobs is not as important as the ratio of the size of hips/waist to boobs. That is, a girl that is a size 2 in jeans can have a small B cup and look much better than a girl that is a size 8 with a C cup. Yes, her boobs are bigger but the ratio of waist to boobs is not as appealing.

It is for this reason that no one is interested in seeing big boobs on obese women. Even though the boobs are very large, the belly is also very large thus the appeal is just not there.

I am submitting this postulate to a few peer reviewed publications for further analysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My aunt told me last night that my tits looked bigger. I told her if I lost a little weight, they probably would go down a little bit. She told me the first place where women gain weight is in their boobs. I told her I should just gain more weight then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would prefer the size 8 woman with the C cup. I don't really care fore women that look like they just went to a Holocaust Summer camp for vacation.

lol size 8 is a little past the holocaust.

your thinking more size 0.

some people are just small though and cant help they have to wear small clothes, but that doesn't mean they are deathly skinny!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...