Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smart people do more drugs


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

I knew it!!!

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/Smart-People-Do-More-Drugs-Because-of-Evolution-2425

Consistent with the prediction of the Hypothesis, the analysis of the National Child Development Study shows that more intelligent children in the United Kingdom are more likely to grow up to consume psychoactive drugs than less intelligent children. ... "Very bright" individuals (with IQs above 125) are roughly three-tenths of a standard deviation more likely to consume psychoactive drugs than "very dull" individuals (with IQs below 75).

If that pattern holds across societies, then it runs directly counter to a lot of our preconceived notions about both intelligence and drug use:

People--scientists and civilians alike--often associate intelligence with positive life outcomes. The fact that more intelligent individuals are more likely to consume alcohol, tobacco, and psychoactive drugs tampers this universally positive view of intelligence and intelligent individuals. Intelligent people don't always do the right thing, only the evolutionarily novel thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://wilderdom.com/intelligence/IQWhatScoresMean.html

Basically it's saying only genius or people with superior intelligence fall into the above category and someone mentioned it already that they are just bored with life.

Also, the "very dull" or bottom half means you are seriously deficient and/or borderline retarded so I don't think drugs are an option.

Most of the people that do drugs are still probably stupid and most smart people (above average intelligence, not genius) don't do drugs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://wilderdom.com/intelligence/IQWhatScoresMean.html

Basically it's saying only genius or people with superior intelligence fall into the above category and someone mentioned it already that they are just bored with life.

Also, the "very dull" or bottom half means you are seriously deficient and/or borderline retarded so I don't think drugs are an option.

Most of the people that do drugs are still probably stupid and most smart people (above average intelligence, not genius) don't do drugs.

However, geniuses are usually crazy and need drugs to calm themselves down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it true that Einstein proved his theory of relativity while on acid or something? I remember hearing that somewhere.

I don't know if there is proof of that, he might have done it, but LSD wasn't even really known about by Hoffmann until '43 when he absorbed it on accident. Einsten may have tried it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if there is proof of that, he might have done it, but LSD wasn't even really known about by Hoffmann until '43 when he absorbed it on accident. Einsten may have tried it though.

I just happend to catch a documentary on TV about that today. I would freak out if I took LSD by accident!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...