Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge, why do you like Mykel Williams?


 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

curious to why you think he has a very low ceiling?

 

Because is he extremely undeveloped after 3 years in college in terms of his pass rush capability. 

Also, he is not the insane, freak athlete that someone like Shemar Stewart is. So he is going to need to be reliant on very good techniques that he doesn't yet possess and somehow hasn't developed through 3 years in college. 

So, let's say I am at least somewhat right on my evaluation, now you have an above average run blocking DE/EDGE with below average pass rushing ability. 

Well those guys aren't exactly rare in the NFL. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2025 at 11:45 AM, LinvilleGorge said:

BINGO

Stewart and his "UDFA just hoping he can land a camp invite" production being talked about as a potential top 10 pick is fuging wild. I know this draft is being perceived as light on top shelf talent but c'mon...

"UDFA" is a bit of a stretch.

I agree the sack numbers aren't what you would like but they don't tell the entire picture.

His run defense was great.  

According to this article he actually led the team in pressures, which are actually sometimes a better indicator of future sacks than sacks are.  The guy that gets the sack often isn't the guy that caused the sack.  Thats the difference between scouting by watching film and box score scouting.

Also, the fact he led the team in pressures is somewhat surprising because his true pass sets were actually limited.

I'm not saying he is deserving of a top 10 pick but this idea that his tape is indictive of a UDFA or even 4th or 5th rounder is absurd.

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

According to this article he actually led the team in pressures, which are actually sometimes a better indicator of future sacks than sacks are.  The guy that gets the sack often isn't the guy that caused the sack.  Thats the difference between scouting by watching film and box score scouting.

To be fair this is the same thing the people that were pounding the table for paying Burns a huge sum of money said. How has that worked out so far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Because is he extremely undeveloped after 3 years in college in terms of his pass rush capability. 

Also, he is not the insane, freak athlete that someone like Shemar Stewart is. So he is going to need to be reliant on very good techniques that he doesn't yet possess and somehow hasn't developed through 3 years in college. 

So, let's say I am at least somewhat right on my evaluation, now you have an above average run blocking DE/EDGE with below average pass rushing ability. 

Well those guys aren't exactly rare in the NFL. 

 

One thing the panther normally like to have with their draft picks including 1st, was younger age. Coofus and NIL has torn that up, but its still in their ranking system I bet. 

Guess who is the current youngest panther- brooks.....

Tremble was younger than many in this past draft and he was heading into his 4th year. 

Icky was a young 21. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

To be fair this is the same thing the people that were pounding the table for paying Burns a huge sum of money said. How has that worked out so far?

yep, because one example proves a fact wrong.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

One thing the panther normally like to have with their draft picks including 1st, was younger age. Coofus and NIL has torn that up, but its still in their ranking system I bet. 

Guess who is the current youngest panther- brooks.....

Tremble was younger than many in this past draft and he was heading into his 4th year. 

Icky was a young 21. 

Yeah, I mean, it's fine to bank on youth but it can't outweigh who you are as a prospect. I don't look at a guy and say, "Oh I have an extra two years to develop this guy" on a team that needs a ton of help at every position. If I were an elite team with depth to spare, hey, why not? But those teams also draft in the range I think he should be in, middle of the 1st to end of the 1st.

3 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

yep, because one example proves a fact wrong.

That's fine but I think you are going to struggle pretty heavily to find a guy that WASN'T arguably playing out of position his entire college career that was as unproductive in college as Stewart has been that panned out in the NFL. ESPECIALLY as a top 10 pick. 

Now, if we are talking a top of the 4th round pick? You run to the podium with that Stewart card and don't look back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I mean, it's fine to bank on youth but it can't outweigh who you are as a prospect. I don't look at a guy and say, "Oh I have an extra two years to develop this guy" on a team that needs a ton of help at every position. If I were an elite team with depth to spare, hey, why not? But those teams also draft in the range I think he should be in, middle of the 1st to end of the 1st.

That's fine but I think you are going to struggle pretty heavily to find a guy that WASN'T arguably playing out of position his entire college career that was as unproductive in college as Stewart has been that panned out in the NFL. ESPECIALLY as a top 10 pick. 

Now, if we are talking a top of the 4th round pick? You run to the podium with that Stewart card and don't look back.

by unproductive you mean "sack total", because by the tape he was disruptive and his pressures actually led the team, which was surprising by having limited pass rush sets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

To me this sticks out like a sore thumb and should sound familiar to Panthers fans.

Quote

If there’s one thing I think Stewart needs to improve on, it’s simply finishing plays. I think he’s such a forceful and explosive athlete that he flies in out of control and ends up flying past the QB or not being able to throttle down to get the sack. It’s very much like if you gave an eight-year-old the keys to an F1 car; it would look awesome but some of the throttling down stuff would be an adventure. I think Stewart gets unfairly labeled a “project” when some of his work and pass rush plan is that of a first year starter who can be a superstar--he just needs to figure out how to finish.

This is one thing that has always separated the good pass rushers(Burns) and the elite pass rushers. It is the ability to consistently finish these type of plays. It doesn't mean that there isn't value in creating pressure, there definitely is. However, if you don't have other guys able to clean up those QB's getting flushed out, it doesn't end up amounting to the result you want against elite QB's. 

I just think Stewart has too many question marks for me to be comfortable with as a 1st round pick. Love the athlete. Definitely love the athlete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

by unproductive you mean "sack total", because by the tape he was disruptive and his pressures actually led the team, which was surprising by having limited pass rush sets.

I mean you are making the Brian Burns argument again. Would you rather have Brian Burns or Trey Hendrickson(taken in the 3rd round) in hindsight? 

We will see how it all shakes out but don't be surprised if Stewart never really fully develops.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...