Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bobcats/Bulls Talking Trade for James Johnson?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/21203/bulls-hold-off-signing-third-pg

Sources close to the situation told ESPN.com that a trade sending James Johnson to Charlotte has emerged one option, but it remains to be seen if such talks get serious … or if Johnson remains as available as he was in the offseason after seizing a rotation spot under new coach Tom Thibodeau.

At this point, yes please. I have a feeling it's another LB trade as Johnson is a big guy that can handle the ball. If it's for Diaw, I'd be all over this even more, b/c from watching Johnson at Wake, he's athletic and will get physical. IDK if he's played like that in the pros, but I'm sure he's an upgrade over Diaw in the physicality area, and he can play SF/PF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're going to trade Diaw, the bobcats definitely need to bring in either (A good shooter/back-up PF) or a Starting/Legitimate Center.

I honestly don't know much about Johnson, but if he fills either of those rolls I'll be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I read the other article suggesting it was for Hendo earlier too. I'd like to see what Hendo can do here, but I don't feel like he's going to get a fair shot with LB and each game I've watched this year, he's looked pretty bad - especially passing.

And I watched JJ last night, yeah, he did look uninvolved, but there's a lot of questions there as well... He's with his second coach in as many seasons. He also supposedly had played really well during the preseason and earned a spot in Thibadeaux's (sp?) rotation.

Just from my memories of him at Wake I remember him as a guy that:

*can create his own shot

*can create shots for others with his ball handling but seemed to be more of a blackhole on offense, if he got it, it's probably going to be shot

*athletic

*can be tough and physical but likes to play on the outside, but doesn't have a problem mixing it up

*likes to finish strong in the lane

So, he could bring some skills that Diaw doesn't have or won't do.

By no means would he fix all of our problems, not even close, but I'm just excited for something to happen. And I know I undervalue Diaw a lot, but I'm just tired of his soft play...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Derrick Brown is better then JJ

Honestly, as crazy as it sounds, I've wondered before (and mentioned it on BP but of course no one responded), if we really wanted to shake things up and get a big piece back and traded Crash.

Now, Crash is my favorite player, but hear me out...

We lack a legitimate go-to scorer, we always have. Whether it be a guard or in the post, although I prefer a guard as a go-to guy... That's why we always struggle offensively.

If we traded Crash for a piece like that, I suggested that Brown may not be that big of a drop-off. I know Crash fills up the stat sheet and I love his game. But, because Brown is young, I've wondered if he isn't going to be the same player as Crash the older he gets or even better offensively. He already came in the league with athleticism (not quite to Crash's level, but still high up there), he has a better shot than Crash ever has or will naturally, and he's about the same size, he's physical and can play the 4 too. So how much would we really drop off in the long term? Plus, Crash is getting older and has had so many injuries.

I love Crash and would hate to see him go, but if we were able to get a key piece - a go-to scorer, post player, etc. - then it may not hurt us as bad as we think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...