Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyler Warren


45catfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Oh, I'm not giving up on him, and I hope he grows and grows into a great TE, but he is far from dominant on the field right now. Pair him up with another young, but dominant TE and it opens a world of opportunities for our offense, both in the passing and rushing game. We would move more into the dictating our game to the other team than having their defense ram what they wanted to down our throats.

We need hitters on offense. We need multi-role guys on the field. And we need some punch in the now before Thielen finally gets caught by Father Time. 

 

thats not our offense though, that certainly isnt Canalas offense at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

thats not our offense though, that certainly isnt Canalas offense at all

Basically Sanders would become the third TE if we picked Warren because Canales wants a blocking TE as his TE2.  Warren would get like 50 targets and Sanders like 10

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Sorry, but his junior year is what most TEs dream of in college.  His Freshman year Pat Freiermuth was there, he wasn't seeing the field.  So his only "non-productive" year was his Soph. year when he was still behind Brenton Strange who was drafted in round 2 in the 2023 draft.

Warren is legit.  I'll take a Swiss Army knife offensive player over a 8-10 sack per season EDGE guy every day of the week and twice on Sundays.

 

8 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

45Catfan pretty much answered this. But... on the junior season, I'd happily take a guy who managed 7 touchdowns in 34 passes. Plus blocked. And then as a senior they roll him out not just as a receiver and a blocker, but as a running back and wildcat QB. 

He is the prototypical football guy a team needs. 

He was a 3 star guy recuit

In 2022 he was 3rd string.

2023 he had a 15% drop rate 

2024 he was the whole offense and super stud


Both of youz guyz have made up minds, his whole resume is one peak at the end. He wasn't talked about in drafts until this year, even then during January on many mocks he was listed among 3rd rounds.

 IMG_9126.thumb.jpeg.6677fcb2a523dada9fbd43260feb3cbd.jpeg.6c4a10365398756fbc2ca65db33867db.jpeg

 

Then the rocket happens...

This is one weird flawed draft, Im just pointing out warrens history and facts. along with piss poor TE draft history and his 5th year leap after being a forgotten member. Sorry he's your fav...

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

and Bryce has never shown that he likes to throw to the tight ends

Which is crazy because they are like a security blanket for QBs.  To be fair throwing to Ian Thomas is not very inspiring or reliable.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jfra78 said:

Sanders caught everything thrown at him and was open alot without Bryce even looking his way.  Why you guys want to give up on Sanders makes little sense to me as well

Not giving up on him, he's just a TE2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

 

He was a 3 star guy recuit

In 2022 he was 3rd string.

2023 he had a 15% drop rate 

2024 he was the whole offense and super stud


Both of youz guyz have made up minds, his whole resume is one peak at the end. He wasn't talked about in drafts until this year, even then during January on many mocks he was listed among 3rd rounds.

 IMG_9126.thumb.jpeg.6677fcb2a523dada9fbd43260feb3cbd.jpeg.6c4a10365398756fbc2ca65db33867db.jpeg

 

Then the rocket happens...

This is one weird flawed draft, Im just pointing out warrens history and facts. along with piss poor TE draft history and his 5th year leap after being a forgotten member. Sorry he's your fav...

 

 

 

 

 

I realize we are going for a mediocre EDGE player, but I don't have to like it. I mean it's par for the course, I'm routinely disappointed in our drafts year after year.  It would be different if I thought our drafts sucked and we were winning Super Bowls, or crap, even sniffing the playoffs.   I think I have room to gripe when I think our drafts sucks and our team actually does suck.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, 45catfan said:

I realize we are going for a mediocre EDGE player, but I don't have to like it. I mean it's par for the course, I'm routinely disappointed in our drafts year after year.  It would be different if I thought our drafts sucked and we were winning Super Bowls, or crap, even sniffing the playoffs.   I think I have room to gripe when I think our drafts sucks and our team actually does suck.

the last six years of suck have hurt me too, friend. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/15/2025 at 8:15 PM, 45catfan said:

Which is crazy because they are like a security blanket for QBs.  To be fair throwing to Ian Thomas is not very inspiring or reliable.

Ian Thomas was only 7 receiving yards ahead of me last season. He bested me by 56 yards in 2023 so IMO I am closing the gap rapidly. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

it aint happening brother

I know that. I'm not predicting it. Just putting the information out there so I will have receipts for later on when this dude turns into a stud at this level too.  It's kinda bittersweet, he'd help our offense out a great deal, but I'm wanting a QB next draft, so adding another weapon for Bryce is counterproductive in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping the Jets draft Warren over an OT, that way he won't be on the board WHEN (not if) we bypass him for a less polished player.  BPA my arse.  I know, I know, he might not be that high on our board, even though roughly 95% of all Big Boards I've seen has him at least a top 8 talent.  VERY seldomly to I see him ranked lower than that.  Granted he's slated to get drafted lower than that value simply because TE is a niche positional need.  Again, Sanders is not a TE1, he's a TE2.  I mean, we tried to make Ian Thomas a TE1 for how long?  Thomas was at best a TE3, but we kept trying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...