Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Banking question


lightsout

Recommended Posts

I am a young guy who doesn't really know much about finances and the like, and I've been told 2 different things by 2 different people. Here is my situation:

I have had a Bank of America account since high school. Overdraft fees due to the keep the change BS has screwed me a couple times, and I am currently paying off a credit card which I got to cover any coincidental overdrafting (and had to use it a year or so ago, maxed it out. Yeah, FML). I recently got back to college after a year off after my initial freshman year in college and the nearest BoA is in Asheville (20 minutes or so away). I needed to cash a refund check, so I went to the bank that was right on campus, the Wachovia.

Here is my dilemma. I now have 2 accounts to keep up with. I have been told that it is a lot to manage, what with needing a bank where I can get money in and out when needed and also needing another bank just to pay off the credit card from my checking to my credit card, thus, needing to use a BoA ATM. I have been told that it is good to have 2 banks, especially when you may live close to one and further from the other (as in the scenario which I am in now).

Should I keep them both active, or just pay off my credit card with BoA and then close that account? Is Wachovia generally a better bank, what with them being associated with Wells Fargo now?

Help a kid out so I don't end up in some fugged up situation later or at least so I can rest easier instead of thinking about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would pare it down to 1. The free checking mumbo jumbo is going away. And only 80 yr old bridge players or those without a drivers license actually walk into a branch.

Direct deposit and use atm's that take cash for deposits if you get cash and that's all you need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive had Wachovia since I was like 10 and always liked them. I have only overdrafted a couple times back in the day because of check card holds and they refunded me my money. Also got my card stolen and went into negatives (because I was a poor college kid) and they refunded everything. I used to work for them too and have never had a problem with my accounts, but I only have one and my Way To Save (which is awesome btw)

Im pretty sure they haven't completely merged to Wells, the transition is moving from West to East but names and atms and so forth won't be changed for a while. I personally like Wachovia better than Wells but that also has a lot to do with internal stuff. Wachovia has never screwed me over.

The only reason I have ever wanted to get BOA is for Panthers banking so I can have the cool card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both are bad banks.

Go to a small town bank where you live, and make sure that they online checking. Close out both accounts, and pay off the credit card. You don't have to have a checking account to have that card.

Secondly, if you need cash and you aren't near a bank, buy some candy at the super market and get cash back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Credit Union... if you can... banks suck ass.

I agree, go to a credit union. The only opinion I have the defers is that I would not close your credit card account. If you pay it off just use it sparingly to keep it active. Have that credit card on your report active since you've had it while helps your credit rating in a positive way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So how about the Mondays after we lose? Because those Mondays after the Jags, Pats, and Bills games better have been run suicides until your legs fall off...
    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
×
×
  • Create New...