Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you consider this a good game from Jimmy


TheRealDeal

Recommended Posts

I don't worry about what other QB's are doing. Every individual is different and qb's will develope at a different pace. Clausen has improved, and thats really all that matters for us. If he continues to improve, then he could be a good QB for us.

FWIW, Clausen's improved play is partially related to gains in experience by Lafell and Gettis. The improved running game helps a lot as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't worry about what other QB's are doing. Every individual is different and qb's will develope at a different pace. Clausen has improved, and thats really all that matters for us. If he continues to improve, then he could be a good QB for us.

FWIW, Clausen's improved play is partially related to gains in experience by Lafell and Gettis. The improved running game helps a lot as well.

:confused: Sooooooooo what do you consider Bradford's game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you consider Andrew Luck's game irrelevant if he does the same thing as Bradford and we pass on him? Get over your man crush on Clausen because Andrew Luck is going to be the pick if he declares.

I'd hope we pick Luck.

Again, what does this have to do with Clausen?

Or do you think Pike, BSP, Null or AE could put up Bradford-like numbers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just trying to get a gauge on expectations.

Are our expectations that low that Clausen is in a category of his own, even with players with the same experience as him?

Is there "Jimmy" good, "Jimmy" bad, "Jimmy" great, then normal levels of good, bad, and great? Where do the "Jimmy" levels fall?

Can he not be compared to other rookies, regardless of where they were picked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just trying to get a gauge on expectations.

Are our expectations that low that Clausen is in a category of his own, even with players with the same experience as him?

Is there "Jimmy" good, "Jimmy" bad, "Jimmy" great, then normal levels of good, bad, and great? Where do the "Jimmy" levels fall?

Can he not be compared to other rookies, regardless of where they were picked?

Sure, Bradford looks way better than Clausen. Hell, Bradford in the first half of that game looked better than anyone this week so far.

I'll let you in on a little secret, too.

The Rams look better than the Panthers. By a mile... and not just at quarterback, but the entire damn team from coach on down looks better this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...