Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which game will be less pleasant to go to: vs. Atlanta or vs. Arizona?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Gonna be at both - but both games have potential to be painful for Panthers fans like me

1 - Atlanta game - physically - since no one expects our 1-11 team to beat 10-2 Atlanta, being there in cold rain to hear Falcons fanatics yell will be even more unpleasant

2 - Cardinals game - mentally - although I ALWAYS root for Panthers to win, a win in THIS game could potentially kill our chance for a 1st draft choice. And it may rain again, too.

So which will be less pleasant ... Atlanta - can't stand their obnoxious fans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely the Falcons game.

Barring an absolute miracle, the Falcons are going to pound the living hell out of us.

Strategy for game.....show up at 7AM for the tailgate....pound 12-15 beers....expect to get pounded by the Falcons....laugh at the comic relief also known as Panther Football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the year that I chose to go to my 1st away game, made the plans before the season started to go down to Atl for the 2010 closer... *insert facepalm smilie* Yea, Im gonna run my mouth a whole lot...

You must come by the tailgate and partake fo some great food and beer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you're record is 1-God knows what, then to me it's factors outside of football that determine the better game to attend. Huddle Tailgate menu may be what tips the scale for the undecided, I don't know.

I would prefer the ATL game, because if we shockingly win, it would be funny to laugh at their fans. If we lose as expected, and their fans are taunting, it will be entertaining to watch them get their asses kicked all the way down the ramps after the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...