Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What some seem to forget: A little perspective


top dawg

Recommended Posts

We have played one of the toughest schedules of any team this year, with a bunch of real and virtual rookies, including at QB. We lost one of the best defensive players in the league, as well as other key veterans (which was probably ill-advised from the perspective of the short-term product on the field, but perhaps smart from a short-term and longterm business perspective). If you look at it, of course we have gotten run off the field.

All this being said, we still have, arguably, the best potential at RB in the NFL. We also have Smitty, and though he is perhaps aging and angry, still has the ability to be one of the most exciting receivers in the league. Moreover, contrary to what some may believe, Gettis and LaFell have shown great flashes of the ability to get the ball down field if utilized properly. We also have a passing defense that currently ranks 7th in passing defense, and with some additions to our D-line, our overall unit has the seeds of becoming stout (maybe ;).

Looking at the future, we will be in an excellent fiscal position to make the tweaks to the O-line and D-line to get us to where we need to be, plus we will be able to draft a highly touted QB, if we so choose (perhaps the best of a generation). Plus, we will have one of the easiest schedules in football (for at least next year).

With a competent coach and philosophy, things may not be so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i still don't agree.

You don't agree with what? That there is a silver lining within this failure of a season?

Perhaps you're arguing about the schedule. If you want to say that playing four teams who are first in their division and the defending Super Bowl champions twice, the Ravens,as well as an up and coming tough Bucs team that almost beat the team that we are getting crushed by right now is not one of the toughest schedules, then go for it.

Getting back to the point, there is a little reason for optimism, IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't agree with what? That there is a silver lining within this failure of a season?

Perhaps you're arguing about the schedule. If you want to say that playing four teams who are first in their division and the defending Super Bowl champions twice, the Ravens,as well as an up and coming tough Bucs team that almost beat the team that we are getting crushed by right now is not one of the toughest schedules, then go for it.

Getting back to the point, there is a little reason for optimism, IMHO.

let's see...the losers on the schedule

arizona 3-9

seattle 6-6

cleveland 5-7

st. louis 6-6

san francisco 4-8

cincinnati 2-10

and the divisional games that are usually competitive and usually swing either way but they don't not just because the opponents are that good...but because carolina is just that bad...

new orleans

tampa bay

falcons

that leaves...

new york giants

chicago

baltimore

pittsburgh

when you drop 6 divisional games and only win one of 6 against barely .500 and worse teams...

that's not a tough schedule...that's a pathetic football team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let's see...the losers on the schedule

arizona 3-9

seattle 6-6

cleveland 5-7

st. louis 6-6

san francisco 4-8

cincinnati 2-10

and the divisional games that are usually competitive and usually swing either way but they don't not just because the opponents are that good...but because carolina is just that bad...

new orleans

tampa bay

falcons

that leaves...

new york giants

chicago

baltimore

pittsburgh

when you drop 6 divisional games and only win one of 6 against barely .500 and worse teams...

that's not a tough schedule...that's a pathetic football team.

Yeah, it's a divine manifesto that divisional games are competitive, and could swing either way (like any other game), notwithstanding that one of the teams has (and has had) the best record in football for the season, and another team is the defending super Bowl champion with one of the most adept QBs and offensive attacks in the league, along with the fact that the Panthers have a relative bunch of noobs on the field playing under suspect coaching means nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...