Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the huddle being overly moderated?


Zod

Is the huddle overly moderated  

169 members have voted

  1. 1. Is the huddle overly moderated

    • Yes
      47
    • No
      74
    • My god you are sexay
      23
    • what does moderated mean?
      25


Recommended Posts

Is the Huddle being overly moderate? Yes, very moderate!

MODERATE

Pronunciation:

\ˈmä-d(ə-)rət\

Function:

adjective

Etymology:

Middle English, from Latin moderatus, from past participle of moderare to moderate; akin to Latin modus measure

Date:

15th century

1 a: avoiding extremes of behavior or expression : observing reasonable limits <a moderate drinker> b: calm , temperate2 a: tending toward the mean or average amount or dimension b: having average or less than average quality : mediocre3: professing or characterized by political or social beliefs that are not extreme4: limited in scope or effect5: not expensive : reasonable or low in price6of a color : of medium lightness and medium chroma

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/moderate

Just kiddin'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well....

I just got signed up for a "non sports related" forum

and the mods their are constantly starting the "USE THE SEARCH" Blah,Blah,Blah

And I mean they don't post NEARLY as much as this forum. So the mod told me "It's so we don't get traffic"

1.)IF someone does a google search to this specific question it'll take them to this site DON'T YOU WANT THAT!

2.)Their forums front page still has threads posted from like last week so that shows that they don't get as much traffic as us....but they're doubly annoyed LOL

I once got a warning for saying 6969 ***** Dr. and the warnings don't even show up as anything attention getting so the mods got mad at me b/c I kept showing the same "crude" behavior...which I thought was normal c/ I thought I was on a big boy forum

ALL IN ALL WHAT I'M SAYING IS

3 months ago I might say Yes; but I've seen the other side and it' ain't pretty...so NO

(but yeah the double standards here can be annoying.) IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. The moderation has reduced the amount of purely idiotic and childish posts.

There are a lot of people posting with literally nothing to say other than a few choice curse words.

Grow up, children.

I tell you your so fuging right. Man right on the fuging point with that one. I tell you some people. :biggrin5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
    • OK, I didn't realize this was about high school, but...if I'm spending my personal money trying to help some kids out, then no one is going to tell me how to spend my money. I get enough of the government spending my money--allocating my tax dollars--to children who don't really need anything, and now they're trying to tell me how to spend my personal money? Sure, there are many other issues to consider and rabbit holes that we could go down due to ethical concerns because it concerns kids, and the need for transparency is extremely important, but maybe as opposed to trying to stop kids from benefitting in darkness, we need to open up the blinds (and blinders) a little bit so that they can benefit in the light. I get where you're coming from, but this is a loaded and layered issue, and I'm just trying to give you some food for thought. 
×
×
  • Create New...