Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

give john fox a new contract

Fiz

By Fiz,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Dpantherman Apprentice

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

In all honesty, the only way Id want to see that, is if he pulss a reverse Sean Payton, and hires a Coordinator to master mind what he has no clue of. Payton hired Greg Williams and let him do all the defense. Fox needs to hire a _________ that knows what an NFL offense is supposed to look like and let him control that side of the ball.

But its not going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint J Newbie

Saint J

Posted
Posted

Remember when fiz used to be funny?

The subject of when fiz was funny is a controversial issue. At first glance when fiz was funny may seem unenchanting, however its study is a necessity for any one wishing to intellectually advance beyond their childhood. While much has been written on its influence on contemporary living, its influence on western cinema has not been given proper recognition. Since it was first compared to antidisestablishmentarianism much has been said concerning when fiz was funny by the easily lead, many of whom fail to comprehend the full scope of when fiz was funny. In the light of this I will break down the issues in order to give each of them the thought that they fully deserve

Social Factors

There is cultural and institutional interdependence between members of any community. When The Tygers of Pan Tang sang 'It's lonely at the top. Everybody's trying to do you in' [1] , they saw clearly into the human heart. A child’s approach to when fiz was funny cleary plays a significant role amongst the developing middle classes.

Of paramount importance to any study of when fiz was funny within its context, is understanding the ideals of society. Clearly it promotes higher individualism and obeyence of instinct. As soon as a child meets when fiz was funny they are changed.

Economic Factors

Economics has been defined as 'I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine.' To my learned ear that sounds like two people with itchy backs. We will primarily be focusing on the JTB-Guide-Dog model, as is standard in this case. Cost

Of

Living

when fiz was funny

Indisputably there is a link. How can this be explained? In spite of the best efforts of The World Bank the cost of living looms over when fiz was funny this cannot be a coincidence. Strong fluctuations in investor confidence have been seen over the past two financial years.

Political Factors

The media have made politics quite a spectacle. Looking at the spectrum represented by a single political party can be reminiscent of comparing pre and post war views of when fiz was funny.

One quote comes instantly to mind when examining this topic. I mean of course the words of award winning journalist Xaviera Tuigamala 'political change changes politics, but where does it go?' [2] I couldn't have put it better my self. When it comes to when fiz was funny this is clearly true. If I may be as bold as to paraphrase, he was saying that 'political ideals are built on the solid cornerstone of when fiz was funny.'

Where do we go from here? Only time will tell.

Conclusion

In summary, when fiz was funny has played a large part in the development of man in the 20th Century and its influence remains strong. It establishes order, invades where necessary and is always fashionably late.

As a parting shot here are the words of super-star Courteney Pfeiffer: 'You win some, you loose some, but when fiz was funny wins most often.' [3]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Punisher Newbie

Punisher

Posted
Posted

The subject of when fiz was funny is a controversial issue. At first glance when fiz was funny may seem unenchanting, however its study is a necessity for any one wishing to intellectually advance beyond their childhood. While much has been written on its influence on contemporary living, its influence on western cinema has not been given proper recognition. Since it was first compared to antidisestablishmentarianism much has been said concerning when fiz was funny by the easily lead, many of whom fail to comprehend the full scope of when fiz was funny. In the light of this I will break down the issues in order to give each of them the thought that they fully deserve

Social Factors

There is cultural and institutional interdependence between members of any community. When The Tygers of Pan Tang sang 'It's lonely at the top. Everybody's trying to do you in' [1] , they saw clearly into the human heart. A child’s approach to when fiz was funny cleary plays a significant role amongst the developing middle classes.

Of paramount importance to any study of when fiz was funny within its context, is understanding the ideals of society. Clearly it promotes higher individualism and obeyence of instinct. As soon as a child meets when fiz was funny they are changed.

Economic Factors

Economics has been defined as 'I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine.' To my learned ear that sounds like two people with itchy backs. We will primarily be focusing on the JTB-Guide-Dog model, as is standard in this case. Cost

Of

Living

when fiz was funny

Indisputably there is a link. How can this be explained? In spite of the best efforts of The World Bank the cost of living looms over when fiz was funny this cannot be a coincidence. Strong fluctuations in investor confidence have been seen over the past two financial years.

Political Factors

The media have made politics quite a spectacle. Looking at the spectrum represented by a single political party can be reminiscent of comparing pre and post war views of when fiz was funny.

One quote comes instantly to mind when examining this topic. I mean of course the words of award winning journalist Xaviera Tuigamala 'political change changes politics, but where does it go?' [2] I couldn't have put it better my self. When it comes to when fiz was funny this is clearly true. If I may be as bold as to paraphrase, he was saying that 'political ideals are built on the solid cornerstone of when fiz was funny.'

Where do we go from here? Only time will tell.

Conclusion

In summary, when fiz was funny has played a large part in the development of man in the 20th Century and its influence remains strong. It establishes order, invades where necessary and is always fashionably late.

As a parting shot here are the words of super-star Courteney Pfeiffer: 'You win some, you loose some, but when fiz was funny wins most often.' [3]

Did not read lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...