Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Story of 2010: Civil War


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Today's press conference sheds a little light on the relationship between John Fox and Jerry Richardson, and what it says about this past season is telling.

The picture that emerges is that Jerry Richardson had grown frustrated with John Fox's continual preference for older veterans over young players. That, combined with a unique opportunity to dump salaries and looming labor issues, factored into the decision to go with the "youth movement".

Essentially, Fox wasn't going to play younger guys unless he had no other choice.

Richardson saw to it that he didn't.

Anybody over the age of 30 not named Steve Smith or John Kasay was sent packing. Richardson gave Fox a roster that included some veteran players, but skewed very young (second youngest roster in the league overall).

How did Fox react? He coached to the best of his abilities, but some cracks appeared in the usual cool facade Fox showed the media. More than once he talked about how the roster he had wasn't one of his making, and some comments implicitly blamed the players (and by extension, Richardson).

By season's end, word leaked out that Fox and Richardson weren't even on speaking terms.

It seems clear that Richardson wanted to force Fox to do things differently, and that isn't likely something that just started this year.

It most definitely came to a head this year, though.

As tumultuous as the on-field season was, it sounds like things behind the scenes might have been even worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also wonder what role Mark had in this now division between JR/Hurney and Fox? Fox seems to have thought he had more power than he did before JR pulled the rug from beneath him. I think Mark could have been Fox's ally while JR was supportive of Hurney. In the end both men are now gone from the organization. Leading the team to the Super Bowl nor being the son of the owner means you have a bigger say than the Big Cat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also wonder what role Mark had in this now division between JR/Hurney and Fox? Fox seems to have thought he had more power than he did before JR pulled the rug from beneath him. I think Mark could have been Fox's ally while JR was supportive of Hurney. In the end both men are now gone from the organization. Leading the team to the Super Bowl nor being the son of the owner means you have a bigger say than the Big Cat.

That seems like a lifetime ago.

Guess it's been civil war all around for the last couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an interesting question.

Hurney is obviously in JR's good graces. The man fired his sons, and Hurney works without a contract.

As a ton of whiners around here love to note, Hurney gave Jake an extra 12 million. That was not Fox's doing.

JR wouldn't hire a new staff because he didn't want to pay Fox and his group 11.5 million.

So how much of this was personal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets face it. 3 Winning seasons are just not enough. Fox changed over the years and so did his teams.

Quite the contrary. The game changed over the years and Fox did not. He continued with an antiquated philosophy regardless of who the roster was made up of and continued to shove that philosophy down players' throats, in spite of the fact they were obviously not suited to his style.

Instead of creating a football philosophy that best utilized the talents of the players, he forced the players to adapt to his plan. Hence, a lot of players who appear to be underachieving and even lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an interesting question.

Hurney is obviously in JR's good graces. The man fired his sons, and Hurney works without a contract.

As a ton of whiners around here love to note, Hurney gave Jake an extra 12 million. That was not Fox's doing.

JR wouldn't hire a new staff because he didn't want to pay Fox and his group 11.5 million.

So how much of this was personal?

From the sound of things, a lot of it.

(and I don't really think that's a good thing)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite the contrary. The game changed over the years and Fox did not. He continued with an antiquated philosophy regardless of who the roster was made up of and continued to shove that philosophy down players' throats, in spite of the fact they were obviously not suited to his style.

Instead of creating a football philosophy that best utilized the talents of the players, he forced the players to adapt to his plan. Hence, a lot of players who appear to be underachieving and even lost.

Maybe not in coaching styles but more in how he approached the game. He's teams become more soft and conservative as he went on. When he came to the panthers his team played with fire and were on the edge of playing dirty ball.

I remembered they changed the way Refs officiated PI after the Panthers dismantled the Rams offense in 02.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an interesting question.

Hurney is obviously in JR's good graces. The man fired his sons, and Hurney works without a contract.

As a ton of whiners around here love to note, Hurney gave Jake an extra 12 million. That was not Fox's doing.

JR wouldn't hire a new staff because he didn't want to pay Fox and his group 11.5 million.

So how much of this was personal?

actually, from the way it sounded in he press conference fox had control over personnel choices. they implied (or directly said) that coaches had been given reign to do what they wanted and the FO was taking back the reigns.

i'm thinking that jake was given the extension not because JR or marty wanted it to happen, but because he was fox's QB and that is what fox wanted to happen. after last season it was obvious that jake was done, but it was also obvious that fox wasn't going to bench his QB so they got rid of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
    • Totally agree with you, if we had invested in drafting a corner or two I wouldn’t even ponder adding Ramsey. But, to be honest we legit added nobody to our corner room this offseason we have nobody worth developing. Even if Chau Smith Wade is better then what I think, he is the only guy we have invested draft capital into outside of our starters.
×
×
  • Create New...