Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Not Mike Mularkey?


Anybodyhome

Recommended Posts

...and 30+ wins since drafting Matt Ryan, a new NFL record. The Bills may be one of the few franchises worse than Carolina when it comes to being cheap, except the Bills do it every season.

30+ wins as a "OC" He sucked as a coach. He will suck again when the 49ers hire him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His last name is ridiculous.

Definition of MULARKEY

: insincere or foolish talk : bunkum

See mularkey defined for English-language learners »

Variants of MULARKEY

ma·lar·key also mu·lar·ky \mu-ˈlär-kē\

Examples of MULARKEY

He thinks everything Mr. Richardson says is just a bunch of mularkey.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30+ wins as a "OC" He sucked as a coach. He will suck again when the 49ers hire him.

we will see :P we need a guy who can coach up a rookie-qb and mularkey would be a good fit to that issue....of course, nobody knows whether he learned sth from his mistakes in terms of being a HC.

furthermore, i think that WE will get harbaugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Falcons offense has never been top 5 total offense, In his first year atlanta had the #6 total offense in yards. afterwards never made the top ten. The Falcons offense isn't exciting at all. You could say he helped develop Matt Ryan but what else has he done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we really want Andrew Luck to develop like this:

mattryanflowchart.jpg

Don't need the flowcharts. Just wins and losses:

2008: 11-5

2009: 9-7

2010: 13-3

Gee, Matt Ryan and company have 3 consecutive winning seasons while the Panthers struggled to get three winning seasons out of the last 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Falcons offense has never been top 5 total offense, In his first year atlanta had the #6 total offense in yards. afterwards never made the top ten. The Falcons offense isn't exciting at all. You could say he helped develop Matt Ryan but what else has he done?

i dont care much about some stats...especially absolute ones, i.e. rankings.

i see a working running game, a passing game which is based on ONE wr and a dying TE and it does work though...it is very ridiculous to say that the falcons' offense doesnt exist at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...