Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Luck doesnt declare, why keep the #1 pick?


tattoorhino

Recommended Posts

Yep...hard to argue otherwise. Geez I'd hate picking a WR w/ 1st overall. So much talent out there. Floyd - ND, and others.

Dream scenario would be to formulate a trade with Detroit to get a pick out of them for Steve Smith and maybe a linebacker or running back.

Not acting on Dwill worries me on our abilities to do much in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only problem is with going ahead and selecting #1 if Luck doesnt declare is we dont get to pick again until round 3. so you'll miss all the 2nd tier QB and DT prospects.

I think you have to go ahead and make an effort to trade down and stockpile picks, we need help everywhere. But, if Luck declares, you take him without hesitation, no trading if he's on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way we don't pick first is if Luck comes out but refuses to play for the Panthers, and Denver gives us an extra pick or player to swap.

Like a 3rd and next years 1st and Champ to swap from 1 to 2 and our 4th.

Even that is soooooo far fetched that I call it impossible.

Face it, if Luck stays we are fuged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he doesn't declare, why not let the time expire on the clock. Let Denver make that first pick. Hell maybe, even let it expire after Buffalo picks too. Then pick up AJ Green with the 3rd pick. We save money that way.

Wait..... Would that work? Seems childish.... but i'm in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only problem is with going ahead and selecting #1 if Luck doesnt declare is we dont get to pick again until round 3. so you'll miss all the 2nd tier QB and DT prospects.

I think you have to go ahead and make an effort to trade down and stockpile picks, we need help everywhere. But, if Luck declares, you take him without hesitation, no trading if he's on the board.

Without Luck in this draft, no one will give up anything material to move up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...