Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera and Chicago?

Paintballr

By Paintballr,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

It wasn't really a good split, from what I can recall.

Rivera wasn't getting the kind of serious HC attention he'd hoped for, and some folks speculated that it was because people questioned whether it was him or Lovie Smith that was running the defense (apparently some internal squabbling too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

From what I recall, Lovie inherited Rivera and wanted to bring in his own guy - so Chicago let him walk.

Don't think so. they arrived in Chicago the same year (2004). Rivera was the Eagles LB Coach prior to that.

I do recall there was some talk that Smith preferred Babich to Rivera. Babich did end up getting the DC job after they let Rivera walk but this past season he was demoted back to LB coach and Rod Marinelli got the DC job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

rivera wasn't lovie's choice. he wanted his own guy int there. lovie and babich were buddies. rivera and lovie didn't really mesh well. lovie prefered a cover 2 type defense and rivera had a more aggressive and stunt oriented defense. it just wasn't a good fit.

rivera's contract came up for review and lovie took an opportunity to get his own guy in there and then that D went down the toilet. babich got fired.

rivera to san diego as an LB coach? probably about the only thing that was available at the time, but in the long run it worked out for him. he turned that defense around in a big way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      I agree, but I've already said that the players will definitely take more money up front because it's more security. But they want more guaranteed money and NFL FOs don't want to do that for several and various reasons, and that's what's at issue.  https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-second-round-rookies-finally-starting-to-sign-what-took-so-long-and-what-it-means-for-future-contracts/ It's a tug of war between teams and players, and, sure, paying a player a signing bonus may satisfy them, especially if--and sometimes "only if"--it ultimately leads to a guarantee of more of their contract, but the teams are on the hook for all of those guarantees when cap time comes, so if they guarantee more money, they're ultimately losing the contract game.
    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
×
×
  • Create New...