Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In 2009: Panthers the 4th most dangerous team...

SorthNarolina

By SorthNarolina,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SorthNarolina Newbie

SorthNarolina

Posted
Posted

I saw that on ESPN first take while i was eating breakfast this morning, the sound was off so i had to just gather what i could

We were the 3rd most dangerous team after the steelers for 2009, I was actually really suprised that they were giving us that much credit, I would have thought they would have picked the falcons over us as they seem much more trendy

I was also a little pissed that they gave the cardinals 0 credit, that's messed up

Above us were the patriots, giants, and steelers

I think that is an accurate rating of where we are right now, if Fox and Co. will address the D-line this year like they addressed the running game last year i think we will be as elite as anybody

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ShutDwn Newbie

ShutDwn

Posted
Posted

The Patriots are going to be the most pissed off team in the league. Brady will probably come back with a vengeance and the rest of the team will be pissed about missing the playoffs.

We have a very tough schedule, I don't see us winning unless the defense gets it together and Jake plays better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted

Pats, Steelers, Chargers, and Colts will all be pretty damn scary next year in the AFC.

The NFC is much harder to figure out. There is a logjam at the top, and to me there is not elite team that is head and shoulders above the rest.

Panthers

Giants

Philly

AZ

And then this group of surprisers...they could pop up and be very good.

Cowboys?????

GB

Saints

Atlanta

Seahawks

Minny

Way to early to tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted

Why wouldn't we be? Granted we are going to lose peppers but besides Jakes meltdown it should have been us in the superbowl. We went 12-4 we should be a threat next year.

Jakes meltdown, the D giving up, us not having a viable way to stop a great Pass O.

There are plenty of questions, and I suspect that we will be good, but we won't have the same chance this up coming year.

Again,

Healthy, first round bye, home field.

P.S. We still would have had to beat the Ealges.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

Why wouldn't we be? Granted we are going to lose peppers but besides Jakes meltdown it should have been us in the superbowl. We went 12-4 we should be a threat next year.

Wonder how dangerous a team we were predicted to be in 2004? And in 2006?

;)

In reality, I think we will win the South next year with a 9-7 record, and will be the only team from our division in the playoffs. We play a brutal schedule next year, but it will make us stronger when playoff time comes.

At least that's what the homer in me keeps saying. :party:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anybodyhome
      Canes vs Lightning 7pm

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • Brooklyn 3.0
      2025 College Football Thread

      By Brooklyn 3.0 · Posted

      I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • strato
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By strato · Posted

      To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...