Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

John Fox press conference


Tutto

Recommended Posts

Good for Fox

if my team was depleted on purpose by the owner, the GM was a tool, and they left me to try to make their crap look respectable on the field... I'd say the same stuff

and anyone who says that they wouldn't talk junk about their last job under similar situations is a liar... most people are vengeful and not half as magnanimous as they try to act

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for Fox

if my team was depleted on purpose by the owner, the GM was a tool, and they left me to try to make their crap look respectable on the field... I'd say the same stuff

and anyone who says that they wouldn't talk junk about their last job under similar situations is a liar... most people are vengeful and not half as magnanimous as they try to act

Other than those subtle slips (and I do not think they were intentional), Fox has actually tried to keep to the high ground. Those slips certainly give us an idea of how he really feels, but he's not come right out and been negative or anything.

Looks like he's just trying to put it past him and move on.

Still... Freudian slips FTW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and people wonder why i don't like fox, or wonder how you could hate him

he passive aggressively shirks blame for some of the poo that he is partly responsible for

here's a question for you... do you think the front office did everything they could to put our team/coach in the best position last year to win a Superbowl?

if you have a job to do and your company gives you the bare minimum to do it, then you get let go for failure to perform.. I seriously doubt you would go around singing that company's praises

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here's a question for you... do you think the front office did everything they could to put our team/coach in the best position last year to win a Superbowl?

if you have a job to do and your company gives you the bare minimum to do it, then you get let go for failure to perform.. I seriously doubt you would go around singing that company's praises

Let me ask you a question, since John Fox is off the hook for 2010, what is your excuse for him for the 2009 season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the 1st things you're taught about being a professional-You don't trash former employers. It's unprofessional. It's even worse to do it in public.

People that are making excuses and laughing at his shots at the QB & WR situations need to remember up until this year, Fox had to sign off on all personnel moves. To sit there and take shots at the fact that this team never developed a young QB or #2 WR opposite Steve Smith on your watch as though you weren't directly responsible for NOT coaching them up is a dick move. I lost a lot of respect for Fox over that.

"Be the same guy" huh? Guess that only lasts till your next stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During his press conference, someone asked if he would stay a 3-4 or change to a 4-3. He said he has experience in both, and said they have not made a decision yet. He will go through the draft and FA and get players, and then AFTER that they will see what system to use.

IMO, this shows one of his main flaws, the whole putting square pegs into a circle hole. Instead of signing/drafting players that will fit the system he wants to run, he is going to try and make players fit, and that leads to problems.

Also, they gave him alot of trouble about "3 yards and a cloud of dust", and boring football.

Looks like the media did their research! lol

See this is why Rivera is the man. You choose your SYSTEM first, then draft/ sign FA's to fit the system. Fox is a moron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Fox is not the first coach to leave Charlotte with a bad taste in his mouth.

And Julius Peppers was not the first player to take a couple parting shots as well.

My question to the board is this:

Now that we've witnessed coaches leaving and making some not so complimentary comments and we've heard the same from several players, at what point do you start to believe that where's there's smoke, there is probably fire? Maybe if you heard it once or twice, but seriously, we've been hearing it for a few years from players after they've left and the Fox coaching staff is not the first, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can say what you will about Fox. I did not agree with his system at all times, but all BS aside, he won more than he lost in the regular season and in the Playoffs. That is a fact. Up until this year, we were not a bad team. Why were we bad this year? Well thank the Governor of the CBA for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...