Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chud is the new OC

Cat'sGrowl

By Cat'sGrowl,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

No I don't see the connection in wanting a franchise QB and Matt Moore. Who has proven in play as well as interviews that he will poo in his pants when expectation are put on him.

Plus the fact that Rivera mention the QB situation in his PC and Matt Moore name never came up. So excuse me for not seeing a connection between this new Panther regime and Matt Moore.

If your Matt's agent maybe you should try another teams MB. They won't know how much of a bed wetter he is.

LOL you missed the whole point, again. I don't even know why I waste my time with you. Everything you post screams, "I'm 13 and just started watching football!" from your sentence structure to your actual thoughts.

I won't waste my time anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Saltman Apprentice

The Saltman

Posted
Posted

lol a coach will not name a player that will not be in contract the next year. I would gladly have moore competing for the job again or as a backup. There arent many "elite" Qbs to choose from.

Oh and I am also not a big supporter of moore either but I wouldnt mind him on our team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat'sGrowl Newbie

Cat'sGrowl

Posted
  • Author
Posted

LOL you missed the whole point, again. I don't even know why I waste my time with you. Everything you post screams, "I'm 13 and just started watching football!" from your sentence structure to your actual thoughts.

I won't waste my time anymore.

Are you still crying about Moore?

What're you gonna do when's backing up somebody in San Fran next season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

lol a coach will not name a player that will not be in contract the next year. I would gladly have moore competing for the job again or as a backup. There arent many "elite" Qbs to choose from.

Oh and I am also not a big supporter of moore either but I wouldnt mind him on our team.

This.

Are you still crying about Moore?

What're you gonna do when's backing up somebody in San Fran next season?

Fail. No one is crying. Just making observations about previous QBs Chud has made successful and the type of QB they are. They were in the mold of Moore not Clausen. Just an observation. If you and KKL and others can't see that and only want to bash me or Moore that's fine, I'm not the one looking silly. More people realize that Moore would be of value to this team than those who think he won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

not convinced they'll bring back Moore... but it is still possible. Wouldn't be the worst decision either if his recovery goes well, as long as he isn't the only new QB they bring in. IMO, we need a good amount of competition this camp.

If Moore can win the job there, good. Same for Clausen and whoever else gets brought in (or, hell, Pike :P lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woodie Newbie

Woodie

Posted
Posted

The big question on Moore right now is will he even be ready? He won't even be able to throw until late spring (May, I believe), and that's just to get started. How long will it be until he is able to go 100%, and will his arm even respond well once he does start throwing?

Of all players, he's probably the happiest about the lockout since that will keep teams (Panthers?) from filling the prime QB spots before he can even begin throwing. For him, a mid-summer agreement would buy him some time and hopefully allow him to show he'll be healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

The big question on Moore right now is will he even be ready? He won't even be able to throw until late spring (May, I believe), and that's just to get started. How long will it be until he is able to go 100%, and will his arm even respond well once he does start throwing?

Of all players, he's probably the happiest about the lockout since that will keep teams (Panthers?) from filling the prime QB spots before he can even begin throwing. For him, a mid-summer agreement would buy him some time and hopefully allow him to show he'll be healthy.

I think he'll be able to throw in March

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

That's key for him. The sooner he can get back to 100%, the better chance he has.

He'll be fine either way. His injury is the least severe of the shoulder injuries so his recovery won't be an issue.

If he doesn't sign here, I have no doubt he'll be on an NFL roster next year. There are a lot of teams with QB needs and not much out there.

Truthfully, if he wasn't here this year and he was entering the FA class, people would be screaming for him. Grass is always greener I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...