Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

[The Athletic] Dane Brugler's 2025 7-round Mock Draft


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 4/17/2025 at 3:41 PM, kungfoodude said:

I love Bech. A guy with some speed that can actually catch the ball.

I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do

Yeah, this WR class has some very good candidates to be productive NFL WR's, if not many candidates to be NFL stars. 

Currently, the only truly consistent and productive WR we have had since the Moore trade is AT. One would think we would eventually attempt to remedy that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, this WR class has some very good candidates to be productive NFL WR's, if not many candidates to be NFL stars. 

 

That is it--and you and I both know that some star emerges from these ranks every year--I see Bech as a guy who can have an AT-type career.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, this WR class has some very good candidates to be productive NFL WR's, if not many candidates to be NFL stars. 

Currently, the only truly consistent and productive WR we have had since the Moore trade is AT. One would think we would eventually attempt to remedy that.

I thinkall we need at this point is a productive WR.  I'm not sure Bryce needs a true #1 WR

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, we focus on gambling on these project #1 WR types versus the obviously better and more productive players.

Also, I think Bryce is best when he spreads the ball around.  Feeding a true #1 takes away Bryce's best ability which is to find the open guy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, this WR class has some very good candidates to be productive NFL WR's, if not many candidates to be NFL stars. 

Currently, the only truly consistent and productive WR we have had since the Moore trade is AT. One would think we would eventually attempt to remedy that.

We have far surpassed attempting we have thrown too much at that fuging position to have nothing to show for it. 

2024 1st, 2023 2nd, 2021 2nd and yet here we are still needing WRs....

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

We have far surpassed attempting we have thrown too much at that fuging position to have nothing to show for it. 

2024 1st, 2023 2nd, 2021 2nd and yet here we are still needing WRs....

Fair point. Hence why as upset as people were about a theoretical trade for Higgins, at least it would have removed us from likely fuging up another WR evaluation again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is a great guy but a horrible reporter. He makes my skin crawl when I hear his name. I heard that babies cry and dogs attack him when he enters a room. Other than that he is a good dude. Now go burn in hades u sum bit. 
    • The job just really passed him by. He came up when basically you just needed to get three or four quotes, toss a couple of team provided stats in there, and stretch it out to column length. you got your copy in by 330, out the door by 4, then chill/shmooze the rest of the day. If you were really good you got a book deal. Every now and then you got to write an editorial. The goal of the profession was like Peter King where ostensibly you’re a beat writer for whomever but you get paid to just shoot the poo. now it’s a 24 hour job, you’ve gotta be social media savvy, the pace has increased substantially, you’re expected to produce more than ever, you gotta be able to look through bullshit etc. there’s still risk of industry capture where you just become a mouth piece. Sheena Quick is obviously shameless. I don’t think Newton ever aspired to be more than an inoffensive beat writer, but even that relatively simple role was just more than he was cut out for. its even worse when you’re covering a team that expects the Fourth Estate to act as a PR extension, or considers them on par with buying Twitter bots to promote Bryce. there were over thirty papers that covered the panthers first training camp. In that environment there’s room for boring guys like newton, and they may even be incentivized to push the boundary a little. But today that just isn’t the case and most of the guys are hanging on until retirement (person, gantt) or they’re good and gonna be matched up like Jordan. im not defending the current state of sports journalism, just saying that what counts as a meat and potatoes beat writer passed newton by. He’s retiring well past his sell by date, but that’s pretty common for his generation in general. 
×
×
  • Create New...